What were you trying to do that didn't work?

An administrator appended a non-existing customization in his blueprint (e.g. [customizations.selinux]) and spent time to figure out why it was not taken into account.

It seems some customers invent (sometimes with the help of an AI) some features that does not exist. Some others might want to use a feature that is not available / ignored for a given image-type.

What is the impact of this issue to you?

Loss of time.

Please provide the package NVR for which the bug is seen:

osbuild-composer-118-2.el9_5.x86_64

How reproducible is this bug?:

Always

Expected results

A validation of the blueprint while trying to push it, raising an error or at least a warning if needed.

Actual results

A faulty configuration is silently ignored (and this is upstream documented as such).