-
Bug
-
Resolution: Done-Errata
-
Undefined
-
rhel-10.0
-
None
-
nfs-utils-2.8.2-2.el10
-
No
-
Low
-
rhel-se-kernel
-
25
-
5
-
False
-
False
-
-
None
-
None
-
None
What were you trying to do that didn't work?
The `nfsdcltrack` (replaced by nfsdcld) is removed in rhel-10.0 since nfs-utils-2.8.2-0.el10 but there're still some places need more cleanup IMO.
- The configure file /etc/nfs.conf still has the [nfsdcltrack] section i.e.
[root@rhel-10-upk ~]# cat /etc/nfs.conf | grep nfsdcltrack -A1 [nfsdcltrack] # debug=0 # storagedir=/var/lib/nfs/nfsdcltrack #
- The man page nfs.conf(5) also need to be update
[root@rhel-10-upk ~]# man nfs.conf | grep nfsdcltrack -A1 nfsdcltrack Recognized values: storagedir. -- The nfsdcltrack program is run directly by the Linux kernel and there is no opportunity to provide command line arguments, so the configuration file is the only way to configure this program. See nfsdcltrack(8) for details. -- nfsdcltrack(8), rpc.nfsd(8), rpc.mountd(8), nfsmount.conf(5).
- The man page nfsdcld(8) introduces some background of `nfsdcltrack` which might be okay. But it sometimes refers to the nfsdcltrack(8) which no longer be provided IMO e.g.
[root@rhel-10-upk ~]# man nfsdcld | grep 'SEE ALSO' -A1 SEE ALSO nfsdcltrack(8), nfsdclddb(8) [root@rhel-10-upk ~]# rpm -q nfs-utils | grep nfsdcltrack [root@rhel-10-upk ~]# rpm -q nfs-utils nfs-utils-2.8.2-0.el10.x86_64 [root@rhel-10-upk ~]#
What is the impact of this issue to you?
Please provide the package NVR for which the bug is seen:
How reproducible is this bug?:
Steps to reproduce
Expected results
Actual results
- links to
-
RHBA-2024:142864
nfs-utils bug fix and enhancement update
- mentioned on
