What were you trying to do that didn't work?

When test Leapp upgrading from RHEL9.6 to RHEL10.0, nic name are not consistent even specified net.naming-scheme=rhel-9.6. I found that the reason for the inconsistent names is using default rhel-9.0 naming scheme. The RHEL-9.6.0-20241219.3 don't support rhel-9.6 scheme yet.

What is the impact of this issue to you?

Leapp in-place ugrade

Please provide the package NVR for which the bug is seen:

5.14.0-545.el9.x86_64
RHEL-9.6.0-20241219.3

How reproducible is this bug?:

Always

Steps to reproduce

1. Set kernel parameters net.naming-scheme=rhel-9.6, but scheme is still rhel-9.0 

[root@vm-10-0-187-42 ~]# systemctl --version
systemd 252 (252-48.el9)

[root@vm-10-0-187-42 ~]# cat /proc/cmdline 
BOOT_IMAGE=(hd0,msdos1)/boot/vmlinuz-5.14.0-545.el9.x86_64 root=UUID=da27f21e-83bb-4fd8-be38-ed5f494e3a84 ro rhgb crashkernel=1G-4G:192M,4G-64G:256M,64G-:512M net.ifnames=0 console=tty0 console=ttyS0,115200n8 net.naming-scheme=rhel-9.6

[root@vm-10-0-187-42 ~]# udevadm info /sys/class/net/eth0/
P: /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:03.0/virtio1/net/eth0
M: eth0
R: 0
U: net
I: 2
E: DEVPATH=/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:03.0/virtio1/net/eth0
E: SUBSYSTEM=net
E: INTERFACE=eth0
E: IFINDEX=2
E: USEC_INITIALIZED=4016111
E: ID_NET_DRIVER=virtio_net
E: ID_NET_NAMING_SCHEME=rhel-9.0

Expected results

Actual results

https://github.com/redhat-plumbers/systemd-rhel10/blob/main/src/shared/netif-naming-scheme.h#L86
https://github.com/redhat-plumbers/systemd-rhel9/blob/main/src/shared/netif-naming-scheme.h#L76
have 9.6 scheme in rhel10's systemd yet