• None
    • Moderate
    • sst_cs_infra_services
    • ssg_core_services
    • None
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • None
    • None
    • If docs needed, set a value
    • None

      Filed from caserun https://tcms.engineering.redhat.com/run/433778/

      Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
      cups-filters-1.0.35-29.el7_9.x86_64

      Steps to Reproduce:
      Run the test on RHEL-7.9

      Actual results:

      ==9376== LEAK SUMMARY:
      ==9376== definitely lost: 12 bytes in 3 blocks
      ==9376== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
      ==9376== possibly lost: 3,096 bytes in 26 blocks
      ==9376== still reachable: 313,856 bytes in 4,578 blocks
      ==9376== of which reachable via heuristic:
      ==9376== length64 : 928 bytes in 16 blocks
      ==9376== newarray : 1,728 bytes in 28 blocks
      ==9376== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
      ==9376== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
      ==9376== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
      ==9376==
      ==9376== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
      ==9376== ERROR SUMMARY: 29 errors from 29 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)

      ~~~

      ==9376== HEAP SUMMARY:
      ==9376== in use at exit: 329,300 bytes in 4,706 blocks
      ==9376== total heap usage: 22,605 allocs, 17,899 frees, 3,637,971 bytes allocated
      ==9376==
      ==9376== 4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 8 of 1,553
      ==9376== at 0x4C29F73: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:309)
      ==9376== by 0x804CB89: strdup (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
      ==9376== by 0x61C5AA1: ppd_read (ppd.c:3211)
      ==9376== by 0x61C6245: _ppdOpen (ppd.c:559)
      ==9376== by 0x61C9426: _ppdOpenFile (ppd.c:2152)
      ==9376== by 0x118906: ??? (in /usr/sbin/cups-browsed)
      ==9376== by 0x5A96B4C: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.5600.1)
      ==9376== by 0x5A96118: g_main_context_dispatch (in /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.5600.1)
      ==9376== by 0x5A96477: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.5600.1)
      ==9376== by 0x5A96749: g_main_loop_run (in /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.5600.1)
      ==9376== by 0x1108C1: ??? (in /usr/sbin/cups-browsed)
      ==9376== by 0x7FE2554: (below main) (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
      ==9376==
      ==9376== 4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 9 of 1,553
      ==9376== at 0x4C29F73: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:309)
      ==9376== by 0x804CB89: strdup (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
      ==9376== by 0x61C5AA1: ppd_read (ppd.c:3211)
      ==9376== by 0x61C6245: _ppdOpen (ppd.c:559)
      ==9376== by 0x61C9426: _ppdOpenFile (ppd.c:2152)
      ==9376== by 0x115D00: ??? (in /usr/sbin/cups-browsed)
      ==9376== by 0x1161BF: ??? (in /usr/sbin/cups-browsed)
      ==9376== by 0x85E3DEB: ffi_call_unix64 (in /usr/lib64/libffi.so.6.0.1)
      ==9376== by 0x85E3714: ffi_call (in /usr/lib64/libffi.so.6.0.1)
      ==9376== by 0x5809257: g_cclosure_marshal_generic (in /usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0.5600.1)
      ==9376== by 0x5808A17: g_closure_invoke (in /usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0.5600.1)
      ==9376== by 0x581B0FC: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0.5600.1)
      ==9376==
      ==9376== 4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 10 of 1,553
      ==9376== at 0x4C29F73: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:309)
      ==9376== by 0x804CB89: strdup (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
      ==9376== by 0x61C5AA1: ppd_read (ppd.c:3211)
      ==9376== by 0x61C6245: _ppdOpen (ppd.c:559)
      ==9376== by 0x61C9426: _ppdOpenFile (ppd.c:2152)
      ==9376== by 0x115D00: ??? (in /usr/sbin/cups-browsed)
      ==9376== by 0x118D52: ??? (in /usr/sbin/cups-browsed)
      ==9376== by 0x11093D: ??? (in /usr/sbin/cups-browsed)
      ==9376== by 0x7FE2554: (below main) (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so)
      :

      Expected results:
      Test passes, no definitely lost segments.

            rhn-support-bjmason Bryan Mason
            rhn-support-sbroz Stepan Broz
            Zdenek Dohnal Zdenek Dohnal
            se-cs-infra-services se-cs-infra-services se-cs-infra-services se-cs-infra-services
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            8 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: