-
Bug
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Major
-
rhel-9.6
-
No
-
None
-
rhel-sst-network-management
-
5
-
False
-
-
None
-
None
-
None
In an scenario where there is not LACP because the switches does not talk to each other in a failover situation the packet loss rate might be high. Assuming the following packet path:
vm1 <> br0 <> bond0 port1 <> switch port1 <> switch port3 <> bond1 port1 <> br1 <> vm2
If a failover happens and bond0 port1 goes down for any reason (link down/carrier down), the packet sent from vm2 to vm1 need to be sent to bond0 port2 as port1 is down. That requires updating the intermediate switch's MAC table. That must be done by gARP sent from bond0 port2.