-
Bug
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Normal
-
rhel-8.10
-
mdadm-4.2-16.el8_10
-
None
-
Moderate
-
rhel-sst-logical-storage
-
ssg_filesystems_storage_and_HA
-
3
-
QE ack
-
False
-
-
None
-
None
-
Pass
-
None
-
None
Issue is reproducible in RHEL 8.10 and latest madam package.
[root@rhel-8 ~]# rpm -qa |grep -i mdadm
mdadm-4.2-14.el8_10.x86_64
Steps to reproduce:
---------------------------
1. I have created the RAID0
[root@rhel-8 ~]# mdadm -D /dev/md101
/dev/md101:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Mon Jun 10 01:49:01 2024
Raid Level : raid0
Array Size : 409600 (400.00 MiB 419.43 MB)
Raid Devices : 4
Total Devices : 4
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Mon Jun 10 01:58:04 2024
State : clean
Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 4
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : unknown
Chunk Size : 512K
Consistency Policy : none
Name : rhel-8:101 (local to host rhel-8)
UUID : 867ab06a:8988188d:c08503d0:8c174d1c
Events : 24
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 0 0 active sync /dev/sda
1 8 32 1 active sync /dev/sdc
2 8 48 2 active sync /dev/sdd
4 8 64 3 active sync /dev/sde
2. Performing the scan
[root@rhel-8 ~]# mdadm --detail --scan
ARRAY /dev/md/101 metadata=1.2 name=rhel-8:101 UUID=867ab06a:8988188d:c08503d0:8c174d1c
3. While performing the scan no messages appeared.
[root@rhel-8 ~]# mdadm --detail --scan
ARRAY /dev/md/101 metadata=1.2 name=rhel-8:101 UUID=867ab06a:8988188d:c08503d0:8c174d1c
4. Once adding the entry to the /etc/mdadm.conf below warning started to print.
[root@rhel-8 ~]# mdadm --detail --scan &> /etc/mdadm.conf
~~~
mdadm: Value "rhel-8:101" cannot be set as name. Reason: Not POSIX compatible. Value ignored.
~~~~
NOTE:
While running all md raid commands messages started to appeared.
[root@rhel-8 ~]# mdadm -S /dev/md101
mdadm: Value "rhel-8:101" cannot be set as name. Reason: Not POSIX compatible. Value ignored.
mdadm: stopped /dev/md101
[root@rhel-8 ~]# mdadm --assemble --scan
mdadm: Value "rhel-8:101" cannot be set as name. Reason: Not POSIX compatible. Value ignored.
mdadm: /dev/md/101 has been started with 4 drives.
Actual result:
-----------------
Getting below messages for each activity.
mdadm: Value "rhel-8:101" cannot be set as name. Reason: Not POSIX compatible. Value ignored.
Expected result:
-----------------------
No need to print such message.
- links to
-
RHBA-2024:137909 mdadm bug fix update