Uploaded image for project: 'RHEL'
  1. RHEL
  2. RHEL-30553

In RHEL9 there is a new package nfsv4-client-utils. ipa-client requires the full nfs-utils. With that prevents using the nfsv4-client-utils. Can the ipa-client rpm requirement be made more tolerant to accept instead of nfs-utils also nfsv4-client-utils?

    • ipa-4.12.0-1.el9
    • None
    • None
    • 2
    • rhel-sst-idm-ipa
    • ssg_idm
    • 15
    • 22
    • 1
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • No
    • 2024-Q2-Bravo-S6, 2024-Q3-Bravo-S1
    • Unspecified Release Note Type - Unknown
    • None

      What were you trying to do that didn't work?

      Unable to use new rhel9 advertised feature of "nfsv4-client-utils"

      The ipa-client requires the full nfs-utils and with that prevents using the nfsv4 only rpm "nfsv4-client-utils".

      Can the ipa-client rpm requirement be made more tolerant to accept instead of nfs-utils also the nfsv4-client-utils? 

      Please provide the package NVR for which bug is seen: 

      $ sudo yum swap nfs-utils nfsv4-client-utils
      Updating Subscription Management repositories.
      Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder for RHEL 9 x86_64 (RPMs) 82 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00
      HOIPRODUCTS-4.0.99-ci 61 kB/s | 2.0 kB 00:00
      HOIOS-9.3.99-ci 59 kB/s | 2.0 kB 00:00
      HOICI-4.5.99-ci 56 kB/s | 2.0 kB 00:00
      HOIRHEL-9.3-d20240330 56 kB/s | 2.0 kB 00:00
      Error:
      Problem: problem with installed package ipa-client-4.10.2-8.el9_3.x86_64

      • package ipa-client-4.10.2-8.el9_3.x86_64 from @System requires nfs-utils, but none of the providers can be installed
      • package ipa-client-4.9.8-7.el9_0.x86_64 from rhel-9-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms requires nfs-utils, but none of the providers can be installed
      • package ipa-client-4.10.0-6.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms requires nfs-utils, but none of the providers can be installed
      • package ipa-client-4.10.0-7.el9_1.x86_64 from rhel-9-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms requires nfs-utils, but none of the providers can be installed
      • package ipa-client-4.10.0-8.el9_1.x86_64 from rhel-9-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms requires nfs-utils, but none of the providers can be installed
      • package ipa-client-4.10.1-6.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms requires nfs-utils, but none of the providers can be installed
      • package ipa-client-4.10.1-7.el9_2.x86_64 from rhel-9-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms requires nfs-utils, but none of the providers can be installed
      • package ipa-client-4.10.1-8.el9_2.x86_64 from rhel-9-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms requires nfs-utils, but none of the providers can be installed
      • package ipa-client-4.10.1-9.el9_2.x86_64 from rhel-9-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms requires nfs-utils, but none of the providers can be installed
      • package ipa-client-4.10.2-4.el9.x86_64 from rhel-9-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms requires nfs-utils, but none of the providers can be installed
      • package ipa-client-4.10.2-4.el9_3.1.x86_64 from rhel-9-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms requires nfs-utils, but none of the providers can be installed
      • package ipa-client-4.10.2-5.el9_3.x86_64 from rhel-9-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms requires nfs-utils, but none of the providers can be installed
      • package ipa-client-4.10.2-8.el9_3.x86_64 from rhel-9-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms requires nfs-utils, but none of the providers can be installed
      • conflicting requests
        (try to add '-skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '-nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)

        How reproducible:

      Always

      Steps to reproduce

      1.  
      2.  
      3.  

      Expected results

       IPA client should required just "nfsv4-client-utils" and not nfs-utils

      Actual results

      The ipa-client requires the full nfs-utils and with that prevents using the nfsv4 only rpm "nfsv4-client-utils".

              frenaud@redhat.com Florence Renaud
              rhn-support-pdoiphod Priyanka Doiphode
              Florence Renaud Florence Renaud
              Michal Polovka Michal Polovka
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              9 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: