Loading...

Linking RHIVOS CVEs to...

Migration: Automation ...

SWIFT: POC Conversion

Sync from "Extern...

XML

Word

Printable

Type: Bug
Resolution: Done-Errata
Priority: Normal
Fix Version/s: rhel-9.4
Affects Version/s: rhel-9.2.0
Component/s: rpm
Labels:
None

Fixed in Build:
rpm-4.16.1.3-27.el9
Regression:
None
Severity:
None

AssignedTeam:
rhel-swm
Sub-System Group:

ssg_core_services

Dev Target Milestone:
14
Internal Target Milestone:
22
Story Points:
None
ACKs Check:

QE ack
Blocked:
False
Ready:
False
Blocked Reason:

Hide

None

Show
None
Product Documentation Required:
No
Products:

Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Sprint:
None

Acceptance Criteria:
Hide

AC: Complex conditionals in spec file like the one in description works as expected, don't give error.

`%if v"%pkgconf_version" > v"1.9" && v"%pkgconf_version" < v"2.0"`

Test: $ rpm --eval '%[v"0" && v"0"]' gives 0, not

$ rpm --eval '%[v"0" && v"0"]'
error: invalid version: v"0" && v"0"
error:
${code}
Show
AC: Complex conditionals in spec file like the one in description works as expected, don't give error. `% if v "%pkgconf_version" > v "1.9" && v "%pkgconf_version" < v "2.0" ` Test: $ rpm --eval '% [v"0" && v"0"] ' gives 0, not $ rpm --eval '% [v"0" && v"0"] ' error: invalid version: v"0" && v"0" error: ${code}
Preliminary Testing:
Pass
Errata Link:
https://errata.devel.redhat.com/advisory/124310
Gating Tests:

Not Needed
Test Coverage:
None

Release Note Type:
Release Note Not Required

Experience:

SFDC Cases Counter:
SFDC Cases Open:
SFDC Cases Links:

Planning:
None

Please backport the fix to https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1883 to RHEL 9.

What were you trying to do that didn't work?

`%if v"%pkgconf_version" > v"1.9" && v"%pkgconf_version" < v"2.0"`

Please provide the package NVR for which bug is seen:

How reproducible: 100%

Steps to reproduce

use above type of conditional in a spec file

Expected results

No error

Actual results

`error: invalid version`

links to

RHBA-2023:124310 rpm bug fix and enhancement update

mentioned on

Merge request - 3 more issues and fixing issues with the fsm backport

Assignee:: packaging-team-maint

Reporter:: Jens-Ulrik Petersen

Developer:: packaging-team-maint

QA Contact:: Eva Mrakova

Votes:: 1 Vote for this issue

Watchers:: 9 Start watching this issue

Created:: 2023/11/06 3:15 PM

Updated:: 2024/04/30 10:53 AM

Resolved:: 2024/04/30 10:53 AM

Dev Target end:: 2023/12/04

Target end:: 2024/01/29

Release Date:: 2024/04/30