Description of problem:
Failed to when "controller" option and controller interface are both mentioned.
Check the reproducer below, if mentioned "controller: br0" in bond0 interface and contains controller(interfaces.br0) in the desired state, it failed.

My scenario is:
(Already configured bond0 and br0)
1. I requested the full state of bond0 and br0
2. Changed some values(didn't care about the other items)
3. Tried applying the edited state.
It failed since the full state I got in step 1 contains "controller"(I didn't need it, but I didn't care about it neither)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nmstate-2.2.12-2.el9.x86_64
nispor-1.2.10-1.el9.x86_64
NetworkManager-1.43.9-1.el9.x86_64
openvswitch2.15-2.15.0-82.el9fdp.x86_64
DISTRO=RHEL-9.3.0-updates-20230611.28

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
echo "
interfaces:

• name: bond0
  type: bond
  state: up
  controller: br0
  link-aggregation:
  mode: balance-rr
• name: br0
  type: ovs-bridge
  state: up
  bridge:
  port:
• name: bond0
  " | nmstatectl apply

Actual results:
NmstateError: InvalidArgument: Interface bond0 has controller br0 but not listed in port list of controller interface

Expected results:
No failure

Additional info:
Replaced br0 type as "linux-bridge", got the same failure.
Removing "controller: br0" or "br0.bridge.port" works