Uploaded image for project: 'RHEL'
  1. RHEL
  2. RHEL-129879

[rhel-9] more specific labels for new /dev/papr-* devices

Linking RHIVOS CVEs to...Migration: Automation ...RHELPRIO AssignedTeam ...SWIFT: POC ConversionSync from "Extern...XMLWordPrintable

    • No
    • Moderate
    • 1
    • rhel-security-selinux
    • ssg_security
    • 1
    • QE ack
    • False
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • No
    • SELINUX 260128: 17
    • None
    • Automated
    • Release Note Not Required
    • ppc64le
    • None

      What were you trying to do that didn't work?

      Please provide the package NVR for which bug is seen:

      selinux-policy-38.1.67-1.el9.noarch
      selinux-policy-devel-38.1.67-1.el9.noarch
      selinux-policy-doc-38.1.67-1.el9.noarch
      selinux-policy-mls-38.1.67-1.el9.noarch
      selinux-policy-targeted-38.1.67-1.el9.noarch

      How reproducible:

      always

      Steps to reproduce

      1. get a ppc64le machine with RHEL-9.8 installed
      2. run the following automated test: /CoreOS/selinux-policy/Regression/dev-general
      3. look for failures in the output

      Expected results

      • their default SELinux labels differ from device_t

      Actual results

      /dev/papr-physical-attestation system_u:object_r:device_t:s0
/dev/papr-platform-dump system_u:object_r:device_t:s0
/dev/papr-indices system_u:object_r:device_t:s0

      Additional information

              rhn-support-zpytela Zdenek Pytela
              mmalik@redhat.com Milos Malik
              Zdenek Pytela Zdenek Pytela
              Milos Malik Milos Malik
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: