Uploaded image for project: 'RHEL'
  1. RHEL
  2. RHEL-127905

[RHEL EPIC] Update Docker API support RHEL 10.2

Linking RHIVOS CVEs to...Migration: Automation ...SWIFT: POC ConversionSync from "Extern...XMLWordPrintable

    • Update Docker API support RHEL 10.2
    • None
    • rhel-container-tools
    • None
    • Dev ack
    • False
    • False
    • Yes
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • Enhancement
    • Hide
      Feature, enhancement:
      Reason:
      Result:
      Show
      Feature, enhancement: Reason: Result:
    • Proposed
    • None

      Feature Overview

      Update container tools compat API to support Docker API.

      Update Podman's tools compat API to support Docker API.  We will provide the following versions in RHEL 9.7/10.1, but only as Tech Preview at this time: 

      • Docker API 1.41
      • Docker API 1.43

      A design doc for each version is in progress, from which a test doc can be derived.

      The following versions will be delivered in a later version of RHEL, likely RHEL 9.8/10.2:

      • Docker API 1.42
      • Docker API 1.44
      • Docker API 1.45
      • Docker API 1.46

      Goals

      < Who benefits from this feature, and how? What is the difference between today’s current state and a world with this feature? >

      Requirements

      A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts.  If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

      requirement Notes isMvp?
           
           
           

       

      (Optional) Use Cases

      < How will the user interact with this feature? >

      < Which users will use this and when will they use it? >

      < Is this feature used as part of current user interface? >

       

      Out of Scope

       

      Background, and strategic fit

      < What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? >

      Assumptions

      < Are there assumptions being made regarding prerequisites and dependencies?>

      < Are there assumptions about hardware, software or people resources?>

       

      Customer Considerations

      < Are there specific customer environments that need to be considered (such as working with existing h/w and software)?>

      <Are there Upgrade considerations that customers need to account for, or that the Feature should address on behalf of the customer?>

      <Does the Feature introduce data that could be gathered and used for Insights purposes?>

       

      Documentation Considerations

      < What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)? >

      <What does success look like?>

      < Does this feature have doc impact?  Possible values are: New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact>

       <If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy. If yes, complete the following.>

      • <What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?>
      • <How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?>
      • <What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?>
      • <Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available. >
      • <What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?>

       

      Interoperability Considerations

      < Which other products and versions in our portfolio does this feature impact? >

      <If other products will be impacted set the ‘LP_Interop’ label on the Feature>

      < What interoperability test scenarios should be factored by the layered product(s)? >

       

      Digital roadmap:

      1. Include on customer viewable digital roadmap? (yes/no):
      2. Customer facing summary paragraph (text customers will see on digital roadmap):
      3. Type of change (specify one of: addition, change, deprecation, enhancement):
      4. Related package name, if applicable:
      5. If Architecture specific, specify architecture (specify x86_64, arch64, s390x, or ppc64le, leave blank if not architecture specific):

      Questions

      Question Outcome
         

       

              ddarrah@redhat.com David Darrah
              ddarrah@redhat.com David Darrah
              Container Runtime Eng Bot Container Runtime Eng Bot
              Edward Shen Edward Shen
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: