-
Bug
-
Resolution: Obsolete
-
Major
-
None
-
6.x.x
Description of problem:
A rule/row with 'Fact( fieldInt != null , fieldInt == 0 )' will give an 'Impossible match' warning.
A rule/row with 'Fact( fieldInt == 0 )' will also give an 'Impossible match' warning, if the cell for 'fieldInt != null' column is unchecked.
The two cases above are okay for String type fields (Integer/numerical type fields are affected).
A rule/row with 'Fact( fieldString == null , fieldString == "sth" )' should result in an 'Impossible match' warning, but doesn't.
works on 7.3.1
The case above is okay for an Integer type field (String type fields are affected).
A rule/row with 'Fact( field != null )' or 'Fact( field == null )' and some action will give a 'Rule has no restrictions and will always fire' warning.
works on 7.3.1
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.2 ER1
- is related to
-
DROOLS-1884 Verification & Validation: Null and value not set, should not be the same thing
-
- Resolved
-
-
RHBRMS-1489 Issues in guided dtable analysis - ConditionInspectors
-
- Verified
-
- relates to
-
RHBRMS-1489 Issues in guided dtable analysis - ConditionInspectors
-
- Verified
-