Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Request For Enhancement'
  1. OpenShift Request For Enhancement
  2. RFE-3628

Document architecture of IBM ROKS

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Feature Request Feature Request
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Blocker Blocker
    • None
    • None
    • Documentation
    • False
    • None
    • False
    • Not Selected

      1. Proposed title of this feature request
      Document architecture of IBM ROKS and how this differs from standard OpenShift deployments.

      2. What is the nature and description of the request?
      IBM ROKS deployments appear to be leveraging Hypershift to provide a hosted control-plane which is not accessible via the deployed environment, additionally, it appears to be using the Calico CNI.
      As an administrator, this can make it difficult to know how to manage when there are many differences between a ROKS deployment and a standard OpenShift deployment.
      Please document these differences and provide a diagram showing the architecture of the IBM ROKS platform.

      3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
      Better understanding of the ROKS product. To assist our solution architects with providing proof-of-concepts and the CEE staff members for triaging issues alongside IBM.

      4. List any affected packages or components.
      Documentation ;

            sstout@redhat.com Stephanie Stout
            rhn-support-mwasher Michael Washer
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: