Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Request For Enhancement'
  1. OpenShift Request For Enhancement
  2. RFE-2682

[GCP] Support for MachineSet with additional empty disk definition

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Feature Request Feature Request
    • Resolution: Done
    • Icon: Normal Normal
    • None
    • None
    • Cluster Infrastructure
    • False
    • None
    • False
    • Not Selected

      Proposed title of this feature request
      Support for MachineSet with additional empty disk definition on GCP

      What is the nature and description of the request?

      • The GCP providerSpec MachineSet section supports the definition of multiple disks.
      • if the disk definition does not contain an `image` field we fallback to the project-level default image, see here
      • Right now in order to define a MachineSet with additional empty disks we are forced to link the additional disk to an empty image (an image on GCP image storage has a cost)
      • As per GCP API doc it is possible to create a VM instance with an additional emtpy disk
      • The request of this RFE is to support empty additional disks without the need to link the disk to an image.

      Why does the customer need this?

      • At this moment creating MachineSets with empty additional disks is cumbersome and requires an empty image (with additional costs)

      List any affected packages or components

      • machine operator

              rh-ee-smodeel Subin M
              pbertera@redhat.com Pietro Bertera
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: