Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Request For Enhancement'
  1. OpenShift Request For Enhancement
  2. RFE-1252

Local Persistent Volume in OCP 4.2.

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • SFDC Cases Links:
    • SFDC Cases Counter:
    • Product Experience Impact Score:
      6,010
    • Product Experience Scheduling Request:
      No PX recommendation - schedule improvements, discuss merits, or close
    • Product Experience status:
      High support complexity

      Description

      The customer wants to use the Local volume as mentioned in the Kubernetes v1.14[0] and not the local volume operator as we have in our official documentation[1]

      With that, what we have in the documentation is 'local volume and not local'[2]

      [0] https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/storage/volumes/#local

      [1] https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.2/storage/persistent_storage/persistent-storage-local.html

      [2] https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.2/storage/understanding-persistent-storage.html#types-of-persistent-volumes_understanding-persistent-storage

      Also, the customer wants to use a local directory and the local-storage-operator does not support a directory.

      Can this be considered as an RFE for the local storage operator?

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            Assignee:
            rhn-support-dhardie Duncan Hardie
            Reporter:
            rhn-support-pkhaire Palash Khaire
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: