Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Over the Air'
  1. OpenShift Over the Air
  2. OTA-924

Conditional updates should work for hosted control planes (HCP) in HyperShift (Phase-1)

XMLWordPrintable

    • Conditional updates should work for hosted control plane in HyperShift
    • BU Product Work
    • False
    • None
    • False
    • Not Selected
    • In Progress
    • OCPSTRAT-417 - Hypershift update phase 2 - Conditional updates should work for self-managed hosted control planes (HCP)
    • OCPSTRAT-417Hypershift update phase 2 - Conditional updates should work for self-managed hosted control planes (HCP)
    • 0% To Do, 0% In Progress, 100% Done

      Follow up from OTA-791

      Epic Goal*

      The Goal of this Epic is to:

      • Enable the hosted control planes to consume update recommendations from OpenShift Update Service (OSUS) similar to self-managed OCP clusters.
      • Enable the Cluster Version Operator (CVO) of a hosted cluster to evaluate conditional updates.

      As part of the first phase, evaluation of conditional updates containing PromQL risks is implemented for self-managed HyperShift deployed on an OpenShift management cluster.

      Why is this important? (mandatory)

      What are the benefits to the customer or Red Hat?   Does it improve security, performance, supportability, etc?  Why is work a priority?

      Scenarios (mandatory) 

      Provide details for user scenarios including actions to be performed, platform specifications, and user personas.  

      1.  

      Dependencies (internal and external) (mandatory)

      What items must be delivered by other teams/groups to enable delivery of this epic. 

      Contributing Teams(and contacts) (mandatory) 

      Our expectation is that teams would modify the list below to fit the epic. Some epics may not need all the default groups but what is included here should accurately reflect who will be involved in delivering the epic.

      • Development - 
      • Documentation -
      • QE - 
      • PX - 
      • Others -

      Acceptance Criteria (optional)

      Provide some (testable) examples of how we will know if we have achieved the epic goal.  

      Drawbacks or Risk (optional)

      Reasons we should consider NOT doing this such as: limited audience for the feature, feature will be superseded by other work that is planned, resulting feature will introduce substantial administrative complexity or user confusion, etc.

      Done - Checklist (mandatory)

      The following points apply to all epics and are what the OpenShift team believes are the minimum set of criteria that epics should meet for us to consider them potentially shippable. We request that epic owners modify this list to reflect the work to be completed in order to produce something that is potentially shippable.

      • CI Testing - Tests are merged and completing successfully
      • Documentation - Content development is complete.
      • QE - Test scenarios are written and executed successfully.
      • Technical Enablement - Slides are complete (if requested by PLM)
      • Other 

              lmohanty@redhat.com Lalatendu Mohanty
              lmohanty@redhat.com Lalatendu Mohanty
              Yang Yang Yang Yang
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              11 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: