Objective: Perform a deep-dive analysis of the Component Name codebase to identify cryptographic operations (TLS, encryption, signing, key management) requiring updates for quantum-safe algorithms (ML-KEM/ML-DSA).

Scope of Analysis:

• Go-based services: Map dependencies against OCP 4.20/4.22+ crypto libraries.
• Python/Dataplane: Assess RHEL 9.7+/10.1+ PQC compatibility.
• TLS 1.3: Confirm the service can run without TLS 1.2 hardcoding.
• Cryptographic modules: list all cryptographic modules used in the Component Name codebase (separating test code from product code), with their current/planned PQC support (if information exists).

Timebox: If the analysis reveals high complexity, a follow-up implementation Jira should be created which should be a RHOSO 19 Beta target (likely TBD-PO).

Acceptance Criteria

• Categorized Crypto Inventory: All cryptographic calls (signing, hashing, encryption) within Component Name are identified and categorized as Symmetric or Asymmetric.
• Legacy Mapping: A map exists of all current RSA/ECDSA/ECC usage that requires replacement or supplementation by ML-KEM or ML-DSA.
• TLS 1.3 Verification: Confirmed that Component Name communication logic has no hardcoded dependencies on TLS 1.2.
  All cryptographic modules: The codebase has been scanned for all cryptographic modules and the status of PQC support for each used module is provided. If a module is unused, deprecation should be planned.
• AI-Driven Audit: The codebase has been scanned using AI analysis, and "false positives" have been filtered out.
  Bottleneck Identification: Documented any component-specific performance concerns (e.g., increased latency due to PQC key sizes)

Definition of Done

• Documentation: Findings are logged in the central PQC Support Tracking Doc.
• Actionability: Follow-up Implementation Jiras are created for any required code changes and linked to this spike.
• Risk Log: Any risks (e.g., performance hits in Keystone) are added to the component risk assessment.
• Peer Review: Findings have been reviewed and signed off by the Security DFG.

Follow the PQC Program Status dashboard to check any duplication of common-library or some work already in progress.