-
Epic
-
Resolution: Done
-
Blocker
-
rhos-18.0.10 FR 3
-
Document TLS client authentication for octavia
-
3
-
False
-
-
False
-
-
Not Selected
-
?
-
?
-
Done
-
RHOSSTRAT-569 - Feature - TLS client authentication -GA
-
?
-
?
-
-
Goal
As a RHOSO user, I want to secure my web client communication with a load balancer using using two-way TLS authentication.
Acceptance Criteria
- Acceptance Criteria articulates and defines the value proposition - what is required to meet the goal and intent of this Epic
- The Acceptance Criteria provides a detailed definition of scope and the expected outcomes - from a users point of view
Open questions
- Is this feature fully supported or technical preview?
Full support: Documentation will be published on the Customer Portal - Does the procedural content need to be tested by QE?
Yes: QE needs to create a doc testing ticket per How-to Jira with the docs team. - Does the doc epic need a release note in addition to the parent feature?
No: The engineering feature or epic might still need a release note. Engineers need to follow the guidance set in How-to Jira with the docs team. - Are there any upstream or internal resources that the writer can use for planning and drafting the content?
Unclear. - Does the content require input from multiple DFGs?
No: Stories are not required unless the epic needs to be divided to user stories that can be delivered separately (for personal use, consider sub-tasks instead) - What type of information does the user need to know in order to use the feature?
- Procedures to implement or enable the feature
To be determined. - Procedures to customize or configure the feature after installation
To be determined. - Procedures or considerations for upgrades, adoption, or minor updates
To be determined. - Procedures to verify that the feature is enabled and is working as expected
To be determined. - Procedures to operate or maintain the feature
To be determined. - Concepts that need to be explained or planning decisions that must be made before the user can perform any of these procedures
To be determined. - Permissions level required (RHOSO/OCP) or security considerations
To be determined. - Known issues, limitations, or troubleshooting guidance
To be determined.
- Procedures to implement or enable the feature
- Does the content need to be included in any of the following guides?
- Validated architecture (VA) guide: Is the content a part of a VA workflow, such as HCI, NFV, BGP, etc?
NO - Planning guide: Are there prerequisites or planning decisions to add to the Planning guide?
NO - Deployment/Customization guide: Does the feature need to be enabled during the deployment process, or can it be enabled post-deployment?
Post-deployment - Adoption/minor updates guide: Are there any considerations or impact of this feature on adoption from pre-18 environments or from earlier 18z versions?
NO
- Validated architecture (VA) guide: Is the content a part of a VA workflow, such as HCI, NFV, BGP, etc?
- depends on
-
OSPRH-14137 GA- TLS client authentication
-
- Closed
-
- documents
-
RHOSSTRAT-569 Feature - TLS client authentication -GA
-
- Closed
-
- links to