-
Epic
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Normal
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description still WIP
Epic Overview
All RHOSO's resources are split into tenants. With metrics, we have the information about the user and project from which they come. We should have a mechanism, which would allow a user to view only the metrics they're supposed to see (so only their metric, or metrics from the current project). Current behavior is that every user has access to all metrics. This is partially implemented in the python-observabilityclient, but this is there just for conveniency and it can be easily disabled (which is on purpose), so this doesn't add anything to security
Goals
All customers. The security of metrics will be increased.
Requirements
A list of specific needs or objectives that a Epic must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the epic shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the epic.
requirement | Notes | is Mvp? |
A user can see only the metrics they should see. | yes | |
Dashboards should work. They should show only data related to the chosen user / project | yes | |
Out of Scope
< What is not in a scope? >
Background, and strategic fit
< What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? >
Assumptions
< Are there assumptions being made regarding prerequisites and dependencies?>
< Are there assumptions about hardware, software or people resources?>
Customer Considerations
< Are there specific customer environments that need to be considered (such as working with existing h/w and software)?>
< Are there upgrade considerations that customers need to account for or that the feature should address on behalf of the customer?>
Documentation Considerations
< What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this epic? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)? >
< What does success look like?>
< Does this epic have doc impact? Possible values are: New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact>
< If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy. If yes, complete the following.>
- <What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?>
- <How do we expect customers will use the epic? For what purpose(s)?>
- <What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?>
- <Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available. >
- <What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?>
Interoperability Considerations
< Which other products and versions in our portfolio does this feature impact?>
< What interoperability test scenarios should be factored by the layered product(s)?>
Questions
Question | Outcome |
Does observatorium tenancy model fit openstack? | |
Can openstack users be mapped to openshift users? | |
Can we have a reverse-proxy in front of Prometheus, which would add multi-tenancy by authorizing requests with keystone and modifying Prometheus queries accordingly? |