Uploaded image for project: 'OpenStack as Infra'
  1. OpenStack as Infra
  2. OSASINFRA-3242

API - Data Volumes in CPMS (Failure Domain)

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Task Task
    • Resolution: Done
    • Icon: Normal Normal
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      This one needs investigation, whether we need to have the additional data volumes definition in the Failure Domains.

      In other words, in the very specific context of putting etcd on local disk, is there a use case where the ephemeral layout would be different between domains or if one domain wouldn't have local disk vs another one would have it.

      If that's the case, we'll need to update the CPMS OpenStackFailureDomain API.

            [OSASINFRA-3242] API - Data Volumes in CPMS (Failure Domain)

            Emilien Macchi added a comment -

            I don't think we need any change in the Failure Domain. We'll only need to revendor API in CCPMSO, but that's an easy task which I think don't need to be in Jira.

            Emilien Macchi added a comment - I don't think we need any change in the Failure Domain. We'll only need to revendor API in CCPMSO, but that's an easy task which I think don't need to be in Jira.

            Emilien Macchi added a comment -

            Priority is "normal" for now (and not major like other tasks in the EPIC) because we need to investigate whether we need it or not.

            Emilien Macchi added a comment - Priority is "normal" for now (and not major like other tasks in the EPIC) because we need to investigate whether we need it or not.

              Unassigned Unassigned
              emacchi@redhat.com Emilien Macchi
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: