Uploaded image for project: 'Operator Runtime'
  1. Operator Runtime
  2. OPRUN-2647

Prototyping Platform Operators - Phase 1

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Epic Epic
    • Resolution: Obsolete
    • Icon: Critical Critical
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • Prototyping Platform Operators (phase 1)
    • 29
    • False
    • None
    • False
    • Not Selected
    • To Do
    • OCPPLAN-9555 - Platform Operators
    • OCPPLAN-9555Platform Operators
    • 0% To Do, 0% In Progress, 100% Done

      New Proposed Template (for trial):

      Epic Goal*

      What is our purpose in implementing this?  What new capability will be available to customers?

      Why is this important? (mandatory)

      What are the benefits to the customer or Red Hat?   Does it improve security, performance, supportability, etc?  Why is work a priority?

      Scenarios (mandatory) 

      Provide details for user scenarios including actions to be performed, platform specifications, and user personas.  

      1.  

       

      Dependencies (internal and external) (mandatory)

      What items must be delivered by other teams/groups to enable delivery of this epic. 

      Contributing Teams(and contacts) (mandatory) 

      Our expectation is that teams would modify the list below to fit the epic. Some epics may not need all the default groups but what is included here should accurately reflect who will be involved in delivering the epic.

      • Development - 
      • Documentation -
      • QE - 
      • PX - 
      • Others -

      Acceptance Criteria (optional)

      Provide some (testable) examples of how we will know if we have achieved the epic goal.  

       

      Drawbacks or Risk (optional)

      Reasons we should consider NOT doing this such as: limited audience for the feature, feature will be superseded by other work that is planned, resulting feature will introduce substantial administrative complexity or user confusion, etc.

      Done - Checklist (mandatory)

       

      The following points apply to all epics and are what the OpenShift team believes are the minimum set of criteria that epics should meet for us to consider them potentially shippable. We request that epic owners modify this list to reflect the work to be completed in order to produce something that is potentially shippable.

      • CI Testing - Tests are merged and completing successfully
      • Documentation - Content development is complete.
      • QE - Test scenarios are written and executed successfully.
      • Technical Enablement - Slides are complete (if requested by PLM)
      • Engineering Stories Merged
      • All associated work items with the Epic are closed
      • Epic status should be “Release Pending”

       

      ----------------------------------------------------------

      Old template:

      OCP/Telco Definition of Done
      Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

      <--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

      Epic Goal

      • ...

      Why is this important?

      • ...

      Scenarios

      1. ...

      Acceptance Criteria

      • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
      • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
      • ...

      Dependencies (internal and external)

      1. ...

      Previous Work (Optional):

      1. ...

      Open questions::

      1. ...

      Done Checklist

      • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
      • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
      • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
      • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
      • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
      • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

              Unassigned Unassigned
              tflannag@redhat.com Tim Flannagan (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: