Uploaded image for project: 'Operator Ecosystem'
  1. Operator Ecosystem
  2. OPECO-1615

Provide an OperatorCondition-aware readiness check

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Story Story
    • Resolution: Won't Do
    • Icon: Undefined Undefined
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • False
    • False
    • Undefined
    • Refinement Backlog

       User Story:

      As an operator-lib or sdk user, I would like to have a readiness check function that:

      • Writes my OperatorCondition as `Upgradeable=False` (reports readiness false)
      • Waits for OLM to acknowledge that it has seen the condition (reports readiness false)
      • Then no-ops or de-registers itself for the rest of the pod's life (reports readiness true)
      • Works when chained with other readiness check functions (following any controller-runtime and/or client-go conventions)

      so that I can

      • Ensure that my pod does not go `ready` until after the OperatorCondition has been written and verified by OLM
      • Avoid writing the same logic for every operator that needs a longer initialization or migration phase than pod readiness allows for

      Acceptance Criteria:

      Description of criteria:

      • Upstream documentation
      • PR to OCS operator to switch to the operator-framework provided readiness function

       

      Engineering Details:

      OperatorCondition docs: https://olm.operatorframework.io/docs/concepts/crds/operatorcondition/

      Relevant BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927340

      (likely we want to wait for the BZ to be addressed before delivering this, since fixing the BZ may include an API change)

       

            Unassigned Unassigned
            rhn-coreos-ecordell Evan Cordell (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: