• False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False

      USER STORY:

      As a partner I would like to be able to run OPCT on OCP SNO (Single Node Openshift) or SingleReplica, so I can certify this topology in my catalog.

       

      DESCRIPTION:

      Feature to evaluate running on SNO:

      • Run OPCT mode <default>
      • Run OPCT mode upgrade

      Required:

      • Steps to run OPCT in SNO in regular mode
      • Steps to run OPCT in SNO in upgrade mode
      • Study of running OPCT in SNO outside the cluster, and options

      Nice to have:

      ...

      ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA:

      • Document with steps to run OPCT in SNO, describing any limitations and risks it might have
      • OpenShift CI workflow running at least one monthly periodic job validation the documentation steps (see  [1] for reference adding jobs to CI)

      ENGINEERING DETAILS:

            [OPCT-30] [feature] Requirements to support Cluster Topology SNO

            Marco Braga added a comment -

            Closing this card as Obsolete as there is no request of this topology on OPCT tool, although the tool would be able to run on that topology when following the requirements such as dedicated node. Some limitations would be reported which isn't a blocker.

            If there are partners interesting in refining the results when applying to VCSP program, please comment in the card to the teams evaluate each case.

            cc julim mak.redhat.com rhn-support-rvanderp dgilmore.fedora 

            Marco Braga added a comment - Closing this card as Obsolete as there is no request of this topology on OPCT tool, although the tool would be able to run on that topology when following the requirements such as dedicated node. Some limitations would be reported which isn't a blocker. If there are partners interesting in refining the results when applying to VCSP program, please comment in the card to the teams evaluate each case. cc julim mak.redhat.com rhn-support-rvanderp dgilmore.fedora  

            • un-assigning for inactivity
            • Removing from v0.5 goal, as it was delivered without this feature
            • Moving this back to the Backlog due lower priority

            Marco Braga added a comment - un-assigning for inactivity Removing from v0.5 goal, as it was delivered without this feature Moving this back to the Backlog due lower priority

            This issue temporarily queued in favor of Oracle BM testing, no blockers, will be back to it as soon as possible.
             

            Julio Faerman added a comment - This issue temporarily queued in favor of Oracle BM testing, no blockers, will be back to it as soon as possible.  

            Marco Braga added a comment -

            Updated acceptance criteria with OCP CI workflow to run monthly the steps described on the docs.

            Marco Braga added a comment - Updated acceptance criteria with OCP CI workflow to run monthly the steps described on the docs.

            Marco Braga added a comment -

            faermanj could you please share the results of 'report' command or upload the artifacts to some shared storage?

            We used this folder to research artifacts, if you would like to use a common one: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1x5SJH9-xLj4F8k5wCzXo8PH1q6ShhSOh 

            Let me know when you need help when reviewing the artifacts/docs.

            Marco Braga added a comment - faermanj could you please share the results of 'report' command or upload the artifacts to some shared storage? We used this folder to research artifacts, if you would like to use a common one: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1x5SJH9-xLj4F8k5wCzXo8PH1q6ShhSOh   Let me know when you need help when reviewing the artifacts/docs.

            A little better with improved instance size (r6i.4xlarge):

            10 May 2023 18:51:01 CEST> Global Status: complete
            JOB_NAME                           | STATUS     | RESULTS    | PROGRESS                  | MESSAGE                                           
            05-openshift-cluster-upgrade       | complete   | passed     | 0/0 (0 failures)          | Total tests processed: 1 (1 pass / 0 failed)      
            10-openshift-kube-conformance      | complete   | failed     | 355/359 (0 failures)      | Total tests processed: 687 (667 pass / 20 failed) 
            20-openshift-conformance-validated | complete   | failed     | 3431/3453 (29 failures)   | Total tests processed: 1709 (1645 pass / 64 failed)
            99-openshift-artifacts-collector   | complete   | passed     | 0/0 (0 failures)          | Total tests processed: 4 (4 pass / 0 failed)      

            Julio Faerman added a comment - A little better with improved instance size (r6i.4xlarge): 10 May 2023 18:51:01 CEST> Global Status: complete JOB_NAME                           | STATUS     | RESULTS    | PROGRESS                  | MESSAGE                                            05-openshift-cluster-upgrade       | complete   | passed     | 0/0 (0 failures)          | Total tests processed: 1 (1 pass / 0 failed)       10-openshift-kube-conformance      | complete   | failed     | 355/359 (0 failures)      | Total tests processed: 687 (667 pass / 20 failed)  20-openshift-conformance-validated | complete   | failed     | 3431/3453 (29 failures)   | Total tests processed: 1709 (1645 pass / 64 failed) 99-openshift-artifacts-collector   | complete   | passed     | 0/0 (0 failures)          | Total tests processed: 4 (4 pass / 0 failed)      

            Tue, 09 May 2023 18:38:48 CEST> Global Status: complete
            JOB_NAME                           | STATUS     | RESULTS    | PROGRESS                  | MESSAGE                                           
            05-openshift-cluster-upgrade       | complete   | passed     | 0/0 (0 failures)          | Total tests processed: 1 (1 pass / 0 failed)      
            10-openshift-kube-conformance      | complete   | failed     | 355/359 (0 failures)      | Total tests processed: 685 (667 pass / 18 failed) 
            20-openshift-conformance-validated | complete   | failed     | 3431/3453 (30 failures)   | Total tests processed: 1711 (1644 pass / 67 failed)
            99-openshift-artifacts-collector   | complete   | passed     | 0/0 (0 failures)          | Total tests processed: 4 (4 pass / 0 failed)      

            Julio Faerman added a comment - Tue, 09 May 2023 18:38:48 CEST> Global Status: complete JOB_NAME                           | STATUS     | RESULTS    | PROGRESS                  | MESSAGE                                            05-openshift-cluster-upgrade       | complete   | passed     | 0/0 (0 failures)          | Total tests processed: 1 (1 pass / 0 failed)       10-openshift-kube-conformance      | complete   | failed     | 355/359 (0 failures)      | Total tests processed: 685 (667 pass / 18 failed)  20-openshift-conformance-validated | complete   | failed     | 3431/3453 (30 failures)   | Total tests processed: 1711 (1644 pass / 67 failed) 99-openshift-artifacts-collector   | complete   | passed     | 0/0 (0 failures)          | Total tests processed: 4 (4 pass / 0 failed)      

            I just verified that running OPCT on SNO / AWS / 4.12.15 execution completes, with errors.

            I'll be documenting the steps using AWS platform, still not sure how to run SNO with platform none.

            Julio Faerman added a comment - I just verified that running OPCT on SNO / AWS / 4.12.15 execution completes, with errors. I'll be documenting the steps using AWS platform, still not sure how to run SNO with platform none.

            Marco Braga added a comment -

            This card has been moved to OPCT project when moving "features" to new project, we lose some fields like Type=Spike, and Status=ToDo.

            When the OPCT project support those fields, we can adjust it again.

            Marco Braga added a comment - This card has been moved to OPCT project when moving "features" to new project, we lose some fields like Type=Spike, and Status=ToDo. When the OPCT project support those fields, we can adjust it again.

              Unassigned Unassigned
              rhn-support-mrbraga Marco Braga
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: