Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Container Platform (OCP) Strategy'
  1. OpenShift Container Platform (OCP) Strategy
  2. OCPSTRAT-2539

HyperShift bound service account signing keypair rotation status conditions

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Feature Feature
    • Resolution: Won't Do
    • Icon: Normal Normal
    • None
    • None
    • Hosted Control Planes
    • Product / Portfolio Work
    • None
    • 0% To Do, 0% In Progress, 100% Done
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False
    • None
    • 8
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

      Provide administrators with real-time visibility into certificate rotation operations by implementing comprehensive status feedback mechanisms that communicate rotation progress, success, failure states, and any issues that require attention during automated certificate lifecycle management.

      Goals (aka. expected user outcomes)

      Cluster administrators and platform engineers will have clear visibility into certificate rotation status through:

      • Real-time feedback on rotation operation progress and completion status
      • Clear indication of successful rotations vs. failed operations requiring intervention
      • Detailed error reporting for failed rotations with actionable remediation guidance
      • Historical tracking of rotation events for compliance and audit purposes
      • Integration with existing monitoring and alerting systems to notify administrators of rotation issues

      Requirements (aka. Acceptance Criteria):

      Rotation Status Feedback (CNTRLPLANE-1492):

      • HyperShift must expose status indicating sa-signing-key rotation progress
      • Status should clearly indicate "ready" vs "in progress" states
      • Clusters Service can monitor this status to safely remove old public keys

      Anyone reviewing this Feature needs to know which deployment configurations that the Feature will apply to (or not) once it's been completed.  Describe specific needs (or indicate N/A) for each of the following deployment scenarios. For specific configurations that are out-of-scope for a given release, ensure you provide the OCPSTRAT (for the future to be supported configuration) as well.

      Deployment considerations List applicable specific needs (N/A = not applicable)
      Self-managed, managed, or both  
      Classic (standalone cluster)  
      Hosted control planes  
      Multi node, Compact (three node), or Single node (SNO), or all  
      Connected / Restricted Network  
      Architectures, e.g. x86_x64, ARM (aarch64), IBM Power (ppc64le), and IBM Z (s390x)  
      Operator compatibility  
      Backport needed (list applicable versions)  
      UI need (e.g. OpenShift Console, dynamic plugin, OCM)  
      Other (please specify)  

      Use Cases (Optional):

      Include use case diagrams, main success scenarios, alternative flow scenarios.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Questions to Answer (Optional):

      Include a list of refinement / architectural questions that may need to be answered before coding can begin.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Out of Scope

      High-level list of items that are out of scope.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Background

      Provide any additional context is needed to frame the feature.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Customer Considerations

      Provide any additional customer-specific considerations that must be made when designing and delivering the Feature.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Documentation Considerations

      Provide information that needs to be considered and planned so that documentation will meet customer needs.  If the feature extends existing functionality, provide a link to its current documentation. Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Interoperability Considerations

      Which other projects, including ROSA/OSD/ARO, and versions in our portfolio does this feature impact?  What interoperability test scenarios should be factored by the layered products?  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

              Unassigned Unassigned
              dffrench@redhat.com David Ffrench
              None
              None
              Ahmed Abdalla Abdelrehim Ahmed Abdalla Abdelrehim
              None
              None
              None
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: