-
Feature
-
Resolution: Done
-
Normal
-
None
-
None
-
Product / Portfolio Work
-
-
0% To Do, 100% In Progress, 0% Done
-
False
-
-
False
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)
It is quite reasonable to expect users to be able to want to monitor the pending workloads in their environment and this feature would track the effort to deliver that.
A workload is an application that will run to completion. It can be composed by one or multiple Pods that, loosely or tightly coupled, as a whole, complete a task. A workload is the unit of admission in Kueue.
Goals (aka. expected user outcomes)
Visibility of pending workloads is currently achieved upstream by enabling the on demand visibility API aka VisibilityOnDemand (https://kueue.sigs.k8s.io/docs/tasks/manage/monitor_pending_workloads/pending_workloads_on_demand/ )
This feature would validate and deliver the ability to use VisibilityOnDemand
Requirements (aka. Acceptance Criteria):
Users are able to view their pending workloads
Anyone reviewing this Feature needs to know which deployment configurations that the Feature will apply to (or not) once it's been completed. Describe specific needs (or indicate N/A) for each of the following deployment scenarios. For specific configurations that are out-of-scope for a given release, ensure you provide the OCPSTRAT (for the future to be supported configuration) as well.
Deployment considerations | List applicable specific needs (N/A = not applicable) |
Self-managed, managed, or both | Both |
Classic (standalone cluster) | Yes |
Hosted control planes | Yes |
Multi node, Compact (three node), or Single node (SNO), or all | All |
Connected / Restricted Network | Both |
Architectures, e.g. x86_x64, ARM (aarch64), IBM Power (ppc64le), and IBM Z (s390x) | x86 at first, other architectures later |
Operator compatibility | Yes |
Backport needed (list applicable versions) | No |
UI need (e.g. OpenShift Console, dynamic plugin, OCM) | No |
Other (please specify) | n/a |
Use Cases (Optional):
Include use case diagrams, main success scenarios, alternative flow scenarios. Initial completion during Refinement status.
<your text here>
Questions to Answer (Optional):
Include a list of refinement / architectural questions that may need to be answered before coding can begin. Initial completion during Refinement status.
<your text here>
Out of Scope
High-level list of items that are out of scope. Initial completion during Refinement status.
<your text here>
Background
Provide any additional context is needed to frame the feature. Initial completion during Refinement status.
<your text here>
Customer Considerations
Provide any additional customer-specific considerations that must be made when designing and delivering the Feature. Initial completion during Refinement status.
<your text here>
Documentation Considerations
Provide information that needs to be considered and planned so that documentation will meet customer needs. If the feature extends existing functionality, provide a link to its current documentation. Initial completion during Refinement status.
<your text here>
Interoperability Considerations
Which other projects, including ROSA/OSD/ARO, and versions in our portfolio does this feature impact? What interoperability test scenarios should be factored by the layered products? Initial completion during Refinement status.
<your text here>
- mentioned in
-
Page Loading...