Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Container Platform (OCP) Strategy'
  1. OpenShift Container Platform (OCP) Strategy
  2. OCPSTRAT-1902

status update in CLusterResourceQuota is not expected

XMLWordPrintable

    • Future Sustainability
    • None
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

       

      i am using multi-project quota(ClusterResourceQuota) i see one of the small issue in it,
      for ex: # Created quota with 100G

      1. now created one pvc with size 50G and name as test
      2. again if i try to create the pvc again with the same name test and size as 50G, it will throw an error as pvc with a name already exists. after this, the quota is updated the status with 100G usage
      3. and it takes some time to refresh it.

      I also would like to know.  at what interval does the default reconciliation is happen is there any way to force quota to consider only successfully created pvs

      Goals (aka. expected user outcomes)

      I am expecting here only the successful creation of PVC should be considered  by the quota

      Requirements (aka. Acceptance Criteria):

      A list of specific needs or objectives that a feature must deliver in order to be considered complete.  Be sure to include nonfunctional requirements such as security, reliability, performance, maintainability, scalability, usability, etc.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <enter general Feature acceptance here>

       

      Anyone reviewing this Feature needs to know which deployment configurations that the Feature will apply to (or not) once it's been completed.  Describe specific needs (or indicate N/A) for each of the following deployment scenarios. For specific configurations that are out-of-scope for a given release, ensure you provide the OCPSTRAT (for the future to be supported configuration) as well.

      Deployment considerations List applicable specific needs (N/A = not applicable)
      Self-managed, managed, or both Y
      Classic (standalone cluster)  
      Hosted control planes Y
      Multi node, Compact (three node), or Single node (SNO), or all  
      Connected / Restricted Network  
      Architectures, e.g. x86_x64, ARM (aarch64), IBM Power (ppc64le), and IBM Z (s390x)  
      Operator compatibility  
      Backport needed (list applicable versions)  
      UI need (e.g. OpenShift Console, dynamic plugin, OCM)  
      Other (please specify)  

      Use Cases (Optional):

      Include use case diagrams, main success scenarios, alternative flow scenarios.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Questions to Answer (Optional):

      Include a list of refinement / architectural questions that may need to be answered before coding can begin.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Out of Scope

      High-level list of items that are out of scope.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Background

      Provide any additional context is needed to frame the feature.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Customer Considerations

      Provide any additional customer-specific considerations that must be made when designing and delivering the Feature.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Documentation Considerations

      Provide information that needs to be considered and planned so that documentation will meet customer needs.  If the feature extends existing functionality, provide a link to its current documentation. Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Interoperability Considerations

      Which other projects, including ROSA/OSD/ARO, and versions in our portfolio does this feature impact?  What interoperability test scenarios should be factored by the layered products?  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

              rchikatw@redhat.com Ritesh Chikatwar (Inactive)
              rchikatw@redhat.com Ritesh Chikatwar (Inactive)
              None
              None
              None
              None
              None
              None
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: