Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Container Platform (OCP) Strategy'
  1. OpenShift Container Platform (OCP) Strategy
  2. OCPSTRAT-1570

Verify that endianess mismatch doesn't occur for storage operators

XMLWordPrintable

    • BU Product Work
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False
    • 100% To Do, 0% In Progress, 0% Done
    • 0
    • Backlog Refinement

      Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

      The goal of this feature is to test the storage operators available across architectures of different endianness. Currently, the only supported configuration that could obverse this problem is amd64 and s390x. 

      Goals (aka. expected user outcomes)

      The objective of this feature is to ensure that a volume created using a storage driver on one of these arches can be used by a node of the other architecture without running into issues accessing the data.

      Requirements (aka. Acceptance Criteria):

      Volumes created using a storage driver should be able to access data coherently regardless of the underlying architecture

       

      Anyone reviewing this Feature needs to know which deployment configurations that the Feature will apply to (or not) once it's been completed.  Describe specific needs (or indicate N/A) for each of the following deployment scenarios. For specific configurations that are out-of-scope for a given release, ensure you provide the OCPSTRAT (for the future to be supported configuration) as well.

      Deployment considerations List applicable specific needs (N/A = not applicable)
      Self-managed, managed, or both Both
      Classic (standalone cluster) Y
      Hosted control planes Y
      Multi node, Compact (three node), or Single node (SNO), or all All
      Connected / Restricted Network Both
      Architectures, e.g. x86_x64, ARM (aarch64), IBM Power (ppc64le), and IBM Z (s390x) All
      Operator compatibility n/a
      Backport needed (list applicable versions) n/a
      UI need (e.g. OpenShift Console, dynamic plugin, OCM) n/a
      Other (please specify)  

      Use Cases (Optional):

      Include use case diagrams, main success scenarios, alternative flow scenarios.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Questions to Answer (Optional):

      Include a list of refinement / architectural questions that may need to be answered before coding can begin.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Out of Scope

      High-level list of items that are out of scope.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Background

      Provide any additional context is needed to frame the feature.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Customer Considerations

      Provide any additional customer-specific considerations that must be made when designing and delivering the Feature.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Documentation Considerations

      Provide information that needs to be considered and planned so that documentation will meet customer needs.  If the feature extends existing functionality, provide a link to its current documentation. Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Interoperability Considerations

      Which other projects, including ROSA/OSD/ARO, and versions in our portfolio does this feature impact?  What interoperability test scenarios should be factored by the layered products?  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

              rhn-support-dhardie Duncan Hardie
              rhn-support-dhardie Duncan Hardie
              Silke Niemann Silke Niemann
              Prashanth Sundararaman Prashanth Sundararaman
              Duncan Hardie Duncan Hardie
              Jon Thomas Jon Thomas
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: