-
Feature
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Normal
-
None
-
None
-
BU Product Work
-
False
-
-
False
-
100% To Do, 0% In Progress, 0% Done
-
0
-
Backlog Refinement
Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)
The OpenShift Container Platform Compliance Operator assists users by automating the inspection of numerous technical implementations and compares those against certain aspects of industry standards, benchmarks, and baselines; the Compliance Operator is not an auditor. In order to be compliant or certified under these various standards, you need to engage an authorized auditor such as a Qualified Security Assessor (QSA), Joint Authorization Board (JAB), or other industry recognized regulatory authority to assess your environment.
This feature will ensure that the operator works as expected in a multi-architecture compute cluster environment
Goals (aka. expected user outcomes)
The Compliance Operator will work correctly on a multi-architecture compute cluster
Requirements (aka. Acceptance Criteria):
The Compliance Operator will work correctly on a multi-architecture compute cluster
Anyone reviewing this Feature needs to know which deployment configurations that the Feature will apply to (or not) once it's been completed. Describe specific needs (or indicate N/A) for each of the following deployment scenarios. For specific configurations that are out-of-scope for a given release, ensure you provide the OCPSTRAT (for the future to be supported configuration) as well.
Deployment considerations | List applicable specific needs (N/A = not applicable) |
Self-managed, managed, or both | Both |
Classic (standalone cluster) | Y |
Hosted control planes | Y |
Multi node, Compact (three node), or Single node (SNO), or all | Y |
Connected / Restricted Network | Y |
Architectures, e.g. x86_x64, ARM (aarch64), IBM Power (ppc64le), and IBM Z (s390x) | All |
Operator compatibility | n/a |
Backport needed (list applicable versions) | N |
UI need (e.g. OpenShift Console, dynamic plugin, OCM) | n/a |
Other (please specify) | n/a |
Use Cases (Optional):
Include use case diagrams, main success scenarios, alternative flow scenarios. Initial completion during Refinement status.
<your text here>
Questions to Answer (Optional):
Include a list of refinement / architectural questions that may need to be answered before coding can begin. Initial completion during Refinement status.
<your text here>
Out of Scope
High-level list of items that are out of scope. Initial completion during Refinement status.
<your text here>
Background
Provide any additional context is needed to frame the feature. Initial completion during Refinement status.
<your text here>
Customer Considerations
Provide any additional customer-specific considerations that must be made when designing and delivering the Feature. Initial completion during Refinement status.
<your text here>
Documentation Considerations
Provide information that needs to be considered and planned so that documentation will meet customer needs. If the feature extends existing functionality, provide a link to its current documentation. Initial completion during Refinement status.
<your text here>
Interoperability Considerations
Which other projects, including ROSA/OSD/ARO, and versions in our portfolio does this feature impact? What interoperability test scenarios should be factored by the layered products? Initial completion during Refinement status.
<your text here>