XMLWordPrintable

    • BU Product Work
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False
    • 0% To Do, 0% In Progress, 100% Done
    • M
    • 0
    • Program Call

      Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

      Due to historical reasons, the etcd operator uses a static definition of an 8GB limit. Nowadays, customers with dense cluster configurations regularly reach the limit. OpenShift should provide a mechanism for increasing the database size while maintaining a validated configuration.

      Goals (aka. expected user outcomes)

      This feature aims to provide validated selectable sizes for the etcd database, allowing cluster admins to opt-in for larger sizes.

       

      Requirements (aka. Acceptance Criteria):

      Since using larger etcd database sizes may impact the defragmentation process, causing more noticeable transaction "pauses", this should be an opt-in configuration.

       

      Anyone reviewing this Feature needs to know which deployment configurations that the Feature will apply to (or not) once it's been completed.  Describe specific needs (or indicate N/A) for each of the following deployment scenarios. For specific configurations that are out-of-scope for a given release, ensure you provide the OCPSTRAT (for the future to be supported configuration) as well.

      Deployment considerations List applicable specific needs (N/A = not applicable)
      Self-managed, managed, or both Yes
      Classic (standalone cluster) Yes
      Hosted control planes No
      Multi node, Compact (three node), or Single node (SNO), or all Yes
      Connected / Restricted Network Yes
      Architectures, e.g. x86_x64, ARM (aarch64), IBM Power (ppc64le), and IBM Z (s390x) Yes
      Operator compatibility N/A
      Backport needed (list applicable versions) N/A
      UI need (e.g. OpenShift Console, dynamic plugin, OCM) No
      Other (please specify) N/A

      Use Cases (Optional):

      Include use case diagrams, main success scenarios, alternative flow scenarios.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Questions to Answer (Optional):

      Include a list of refinement / architectural questions that may need to be answered before coding can begin.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Out of Scope

      High-level list of items that are out of scope.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Background

      Provide any additional context is needed to frame the feature.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Customer Considerations

      Provide any additional customer-specific considerations that must be made when designing and delivering the Feature.  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Documentation Considerations

      Provide information that needs to be considered and planned so that documentation will meet customer needs.  If the feature extends existing functionality, provide a link to its current documentation. Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

      Interoperability Considerations

      Which other projects, including ROSA/OSD/ARO, and versions in our portfolio does this feature impact?  What interoperability test scenarios should be factored by the layered products?  Initial completion during Refinement status.

      <your text here>

              wcabanba@redhat.com William Caban
              wcabanba@redhat.com William Caban
              Dean West, Haseeb Tariq
              Mustafa Elbehery Mustafa Elbehery
              Wei Sun Wei Sun
              Matthew Werner Matthew Werner
              Maciej Szulik Maciej Szulik (Inactive)
              William Caban William Caban
              Eric Rich Eric Rich
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              9 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: