-
Feature
-
Resolution: Done
-
Major
-
None
-
Strategic Portfolio Work
-
False
-
-
False
-
OCPSTRAT-12(OUTCOME STUB) Cloud platform activation/retention for Managed OpenShift (ROSA/ARO/OSD non-Hypershift enhancements)
-
0% To Do, 0% In Progress, 100% Done
-
0
-
Program Call
Market Problem
- As an OpenShift cluster administrator for a self-managed standalone OpenShift cluster, I want to use the Priority based expander for cluster-autoscaler to select instance types based on priorities assigned by a user to scaling groups.
The Configuration is based on the values stored in a ConfigMap
apiVersion: v1 kind: ConfigMap metadata: name: cluster-autoscaler-priority-expander namespace: kube-system data: priorities: |- 10: - .*t2\.large.* - .*t3\.large.* 50: - .*m4\.4xlarge.*
Expected Outcomes
- When creating a MachineSet, customers would like to define their preferred instance types with priorities so that if one is not available a fallback instance type option is available down the list.
https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/cluster-autoscaler/expander/priority/readme.md
- is cloned by
-
OCPSTRAT-1337 Support Priority based expander for cluster-autoscaler in ROSA HCP
- Backlog
-
OCPSTRAT-1443 Support AWS Placement Group Partition Number in CAPI & MAPI
- Closed
- relates to
-
OCPBUGS-11115 Autoscaler does not work after entering in failed status for a single machineautoscaler
- ASSIGNED
-
OCPSTRAT-1101 Provide instance type fallbacks in CAPI
- New
- links to
(1 links to)