-
Feature
-
Resolution: Won't Do
-
Major
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
False
-
False
-
?
-
No
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
0% To Do, 0% In Progress, 100% Done
-
Undefined
OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.
Feature Overview.
Early customer feedback is that they see SNO as a great solution covering smaller footprint deployment, but are wondering what is the evolution story OpenShift is going to provide where more capacity or high availability are needed in the future.
While migration tooling (moving workload/config to new cluster) could be a mid-term solution, customer desire is not to include extra hardware to be involved in this process.
For Telecommunications Providers, at the Far Edge they intend to start small and then grow. Many of these operators will start with a SNO-based DU deployment as an initial investment, but as DUs evolve, different segments of the radio spectrum are added, various radio hardware is provisioned and features delivered to the Far Edge, the Telecommunication Providers desire the ability for their Far Edge deployments to scale up from 1 node to 2 nodes to n nodes. On the opposite side of the spectrum from SNO is MMIMO where there is a robust cluster and workloads use HPA.
Goals
- Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane topology to host more workloads capacity - add worker
- Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane to be a highly available control plane
- To satisfy MMIMO Telecommunications providers will want the ability to scale a SNO to a multi-node cluster that can support HPA.
- Telecommunications providers do not want workload (DU specifically) downtime when migrating from SNO to a multi-node cluster.
- Telecommunications providers wish to be able to scale from one to two or more nodes to support a variety of radio hardware.
- Support CP scaling (CP HA) for 2 node cluster, 3 node cluster and n node cluster. As the number of nodes in the cluster increases so does the failure domain of the cluster. The cluster is now supporting more cell sectors and therefore has more of a need for HA and resiliency including the cluster CP.
Requirements
- TBD
Requirement | Notes | isMvp? |
---|---|---|
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation | This is a requirement for ALL features. | YES |
Release Technical Enablement | Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. | YES |
(Optional) Use Cases
This Section:
- Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
- Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
- ...
Questions to answer…
- ...
Out of Scope
- …
Background, and strategic fit
This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.
Assumptions
- ...
Customer Considerations
- ...
Documentation Considerations
Questions to be addressed:
- What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
- Does this feature have doc impact?
- New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
- If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
- What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
- How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
- What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
- Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
- What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
- is related to
-
OCPPLAN-7005 Single Node OpenShift - 4.10 improvements
- Closed
- relates to
-
RFE-2560 Migration from SNO (+1 or 2 workers) to 3 node Compact cluster
- Rejected