Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Bugs'
  1. OpenShift Bugs
  2. OCPBUGS-63027

Job `e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw` is permafailing on 4.19

XMLWordPrintable

    • Quality / Stability / Reliability
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • None
    • Important
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • CORENET Sprint 278
    • 1
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      Description of problem:

      Warning, I am not a CI expert and I didnt write this job but just from my limited investigated.

      The job is failing because we are unable to pull images for k-nmstate:

       

      {  1 events happened too frequently
      
      event happened 108 times, something is wrong: namespace/openshift-nmstate node/worker-1.ostest.test.metalkube.org pod/nmstate-console-plugin-5964f557cb-zbv8h hmsg/d5bf9afefc - reason/Failed Error: ImagePullBackOff (23:41:45Z) result=reject } 

      This comes from an operator that we install in this job from here in release using a pre-release source:

       

      ./ci-operator/step-registry/baremetalds/e2e/ovn/bgp/dualstack-local-gw/baremetalds-e2e-ovn-bgp-dualstack-local-gw-workflow.yaml

       

      specifically the step called: enable-qe-catalogsource

       

      but according to art team this pre-release source isnt a thing anymore:

      https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/CJARLA942/p1760365510760059?thread_ts=1760354263.237459&cid=CJARLA942

      We probably dont need to use prerelease sources for this job but i am not sure.

      Slack conversations with k-nmstate team: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/CP7329Z5Z/p1760349977738629

       

      Slak conversations with art: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/CJARLA942/p1760354263237459

       

       

       

       

      Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.19

      How reproducible: every time

      Steps to Reproduce:

      1. run ci on CNO / OVN-K

      2.

      3.

      Actual results:

      Expected results:

      Additional info:

      Please fill in the following template while reporting a bug and provide as much relevant information as possible. Doing so will give us the best chance to find a prompt resolution.

      Affected Platforms:

      Is it an

      1. internal CI failure
        1. Yes
      2. customer issue / SD
      3. internal RedHat testing failure

      If it is an internal RedHat testing failure:

      • Please share a kubeconfig or creds to a live cluster for the assignee to debug/troubleshoot along with reproducer steps (specially if it's a telco use case like ICNI, secondary bridges or BM+kubevirt).

      If it is a CI failure:

      If it is a customer / SD issue:

      • Provide enough information in the bug description that Engineering doesn’t need to read the entire case history.
      • Don’t presume that Engineering has access to Salesforce.
      • Do presume that Engineering will access attachments through supportshell.
      • Describe what each relevant attachment is intended to demonstrate (failed pods, log errors, OVS issues, etc).
      • Referring to the attached must-gather, sosreport or other attachment, please provide the following details:
        • If the issue is in a customer namespace then provide a namespace inspect.
        • If it is a connectivity issue:
          • What is the srcNode, srcNamespace, srcPodName and srcPodIP?
          • What is the dstNode, dstNamespace, dstPodName and dstPodIP?
          • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)
          • Please provide the UTC timestamp networking outage window from must-gather
          • Please provide tcpdump pcaps taken during the outage filtered based on the above provided src/dst IPs
        • If it is not a connectivity issue:
          • Describe the steps taken so far to analyze the logs from networking components (cluster-network-operator, OVNK, SDN, openvswitch, ovs-configure etc) and the actual component where the issue was seen based on the attached must-gather. Please attach snippets of relevant logs around the window when problem has happened if any.
      • When showing the results from commands, include the entire command in the output.  
      • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has been identified, label with “sbr-triaged”
      • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has not been identified and needs Engineering help for root cause, label with “sbr-untriaged”
      • Do not set the priority, that is owned by Engineering and will be set when the bug is evaluated
      • Note: bugs that do not meet these minimum standards will be closed with label “SDN-Jira-template”
      • For guidance on using this template please see
        OCPBUGS Template Training for Networking  components

              jcaamano@redhat.com Jaime Caamaño Ruiz
              mkennell@redhat.com Martin Kennelly
              None
              None
              Anurag Saxena Anurag Saxena
              None
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: