-
Bug
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Critical
-
4.20
-
Quality / Stability / Reliability
-
False
-
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
Approved
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
(Feel free to update this bug's summary to be more specific.)
Component Readiness has found a potential regression in the following test:
TestUpgradeControlPlane
Test has a 91.88% pass rate, but 95.00% is required.
Sample (being evaluated) Release: 4.20
Start Time: 2025-07-22T00:00:00Z
End Time: 2025-08-19T12:00:00Z
Success Rate: 91.88%
Successes: 181
Failures: 16
Flakes: 0
Base (historical) Release: 4.19
Start Time: 2025-05-18T00:00:00Z
End Time: 2025-06-17T23:59:59Z
Success Rate: 0.00%
Successes: 0
Failures: 0
Flakes: 0
View the test details report for additional context.
Also hits additional tests:
TestUpgradeControlPlane/ValidateHostedCluster/EnsureNoCrashingPods
TestUpgradeControlPlane/ValidateHostedCluster
All three fail together, perhaps EnsureNoCrashingPods is the root of the problem bubbling up?
Failure message:
{Failed === RUN TestCreateCluster/ValidateHostedCluster/EnsureNoCrashingPods util.go:255: Successfully waited for kubeconfig to be published for HostedCluster e2e-clusters-vvlnz/create-cluster-rgdd6 in 25ms util.go:272: Successfully waited for kubeconfig secret to have data in 0s util.go:717: Container manager in pod capi-provider-6c49899869-8wt2v has a restartCount > 0 (2) --- FAIL: TestCreateCluster/ValidateHostedCluster/EnsureNoCrashingPods (0.07s) }
Based on the failure message, I'm a little curious if the test is valid, are we sure the restarts implies a crash?
In any case, this is showing as a new test at least for this variant combo, and thus it needs a 95% pass rate.
This job is blocking on ci payloads so I don't think we can just omit the job like the recent batch of unmaintained jobs.
Filed by: dgoodwin@redhat.com