Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Bugs'
  1. OpenShift Bugs
  2. OCPBUGS-54416

Manually changing the NodePort range, apart from 30000 to 32767 is possible without an error.

XMLWordPrintable

    • Quality / Stability / Reliability
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      Description of problem:

      Manually changing  the NodePort range, apart from 30000 to 32767  is possible.  
      
      $ oc patch network.config.openshift.io cluster --type=merge -p '{ "spec":{ "serviceNodePortRange": "29000-32768" }}'
      network.config.openshift.io/cluster patched$ oc get network -o yaml cluster
      apiVersion: config.openshift.io/v1
      kind: Network
      ...
      spec:
      ...
      serviceNodePortRange: 29000-32768
      
      The cluster should forbidden such configuration at first.
      With the error message or warning message.
      
      3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
      
      The node port range can be expanded bellow "29999" without error.The OCP cluster which expanded the node port range bellow "29999" is not supported.The node port range cannot be reverted after expanding it below "29999".If the cluster is expanded the node port range bellow "29999", it must be rebuild OCP cluster to revert to supported cluster.4. List any affected packages or components.
      NodePort service

      Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

          

      How reproducible:

          

      Steps to Reproduce:

          1.
          2.
          3.
          

      Actual results:

          

      Expected results:

          

      Additional info:

          

              bbennett@redhat.com Ben Bennett
              rhn-support-harspati Harshada Patil
              None
              None
              Zhanqi Zhao Zhanqi Zhao
              None
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: