Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Bugs'
  1. OpenShift Bugs
  2. OCPBUGS-53098

[BGP EIP] when applying RA with nodeSelector, if PodNetwork is listed under advertisements, an error should be given instead of accepting the RA

XMLWordPrintable

    • Quality / Stability / Reliability
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • None
    • None
    • No
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      Description of problem: [BGP EIP] when applying RA with nodeSelector, if PodNetwork is also listed under advertisements spec, an error should be given to reject the RA instead of accepting the RA

      Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

      How reproducible:

      Steps to Reproduce:

      1. with default network advertised, I accidentally applied a second RA with a nodeSelector but with both PodNetwork and EgressIP listed under advertisements spec

      #cat ra-eip-nodeselector.yaml 
      apiVersion: k8s.ovn.org/v1
      kind: RouteAdvertisements
      metadata:
        name: ra-eip-nodeselector 
      apec:
        nodeSelector:
          matchLabels:
            k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable: true
        networkSelector:
          matchLabels:
            k8s.ovn.org/default-network: ""
        advertisements:
        - "PodNetwork"
        - "EgressIP"

      2.  The RA was accepted without any error

      #oc get ra -A
      NAME                  STATUS
      default               Accepted
      ra-eip-nodeselector   Accepted

       

      #oc get ra ra-eip-nodeselector -oyaml
      apiVersion: k8s.ovn.org/v1
      kind: RouteAdvertisements
      metadata:
        annotations:
          kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration: |
            {"apec":{"advertisements":["PodNetwork","EgressIP"],"networkSelector":{"matchLabels":{"k8s.ovn.org/default-network":""}},"nodeSelector":{"matchLabels":

      {"k8s.ovn.org/egress-assignable":true}

      }},"apiVersion":"k8s.ovn.org/v1","kind":"RouteAdvertisements","metadata":{"annotations":{},"name":"ra-eip-nodeselector"}}
        creationTimestamp: "2025-03-13T17:06:39Z"
        generation: 1
        name: ra-eip-nodeselector
        resourceVersion: "1052294"
        uid: 9a5c6c3d-c78d-4784-91fc-579b87a61ed6
      status:
        conditions:
        - lastTransitionTime: "2025-03-13T17:06:40Z"
          message: ovn-kubernetes cluster-manager validated the resource and requested the
            necessary configuration changes
          observedGeneration: 1
          reason: Accepted
          status: "True"
          type: Accepted
        status: Accepted

      3.

      Actual results:  the second RA was accepted without any error

      Expected results:  the second RA should be rejected as nodeSelector is currently not supported for PodNetwork

      Additional info:

      Please fill in the following template while reporting a bug and provide as much relevant information as possible. Doing so will give us the best chance to find a prompt resolution.

      Affected Platforms:

      Is it an

      1. internal CI failure
      2. customer issue / SD
      3. internal RedHat testing failure

      If it is an internal RedHat testing failure:

      • Please share a kubeconfig or creds to a live cluster for the assignee to debug/troubleshoot along with reproducer steps (specially if it's a telco use case like ICNI, secondary bridges or BM+kubevirt).

      If it is a CI failure:

      • Did it happen in different CI lanes? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • Did it happen in both sdn and ovn jobs? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • Did it happen in other platforms (e.g. aws, azure, gcp, baremetal etc) ? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • When did the failure start happening? Please provide the UTC timestamp of the networking outage window from a sample failure run
      • If it's a connectivity issue,
      • What is the srcNode, srcIP and srcNamespace and srcPodName?
      • What is the dstNode, dstIP and dstNamespace and dstPodName?
      • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)

      If it is a customer / SD issue:

      • Provide enough information in the bug description that Engineering doesn’t need to read the entire case history.
      • Don’t presume that Engineering has access to Salesforce.
      • Do presume that Engineering will access attachments through supportshell.
      • Describe what each relevant attachment is intended to demonstrate (failed pods, log errors, OVS issues, etc).
      • Referring to the attached must-gather, sosreport or other attachment, please provide the following details:
        • If the issue is in a customer namespace then provide a namespace inspect.
        • If it is a connectivity issue:
          • What is the srcNode, srcNamespace, srcPodName and srcPodIP?
          • What is the dstNode, dstNamespace, dstPodName and dstPodIP?
          • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)
          • Please provide the UTC timestamp networking outage window from must-gather
          • Please provide tcpdump pcaps taken during the outage filtered based on the above provided src/dst IPs
        • If it is not a connectivity issue:
          • Describe the steps taken so far to analyze the logs from networking components (cluster-network-operator, OVNK, SDN, openvswitch, ovs-configure etc) and the actual component where the issue was seen based on the attached must-gather. Please attach snippets of relevant logs around the window when problem has happened if any.
      • When showing the results from commands, include the entire command in the output.  
      • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has been identified, label with “sbr-triaged”
      • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has not been identified and needs Engineering help for root cause, label with “sbr-untriaged”
      • Do not set the priority, that is owned by Engineering and will be set when the bug is evaluated
      • Note: bugs that do not meet these minimum standards will be closed with label “SDN-Jira-template”
      • For guidance on using this template please see
        OCPBUGS Template Training for Networking  components

              jcaamano@redhat.com Jaime Caamaño Ruiz
              jechen@redhat.com Jean Chen
              None
              None
              Jean Chen Jean Chen
              None
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: