-
Bug
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Undefined
-
None
-
4.19.0
-
Important
-
No
-
Rejected
-
False
-
Description of problem:
without BGP UDN advertised:
UDN pod cannot access default network by nodePort service with ETP=local on same node
After BGP UDN advertised to default VRF
UDN pod can access default network by nodePort service with ETP=local on same node
# oc rsh -n z9 test-rc-ncfg7 ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eth0@if154: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1400 qdisc noqueue state UP group default link/ether 0a:58:0a:81:02:14 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 0 inet 10.129.2.20/23 brd 10.129.3.255 scope global eth0 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fd01:0:0:5::14/64 scope global valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::858:aff:fe81:214/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: ovn-udn1@if155: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1300 qdisc noqueue state UP group default link/ether 0a:58:28:64:02:05 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 0 inet 40.100.2.5/24 brd 40.100.2.255 scope global ovn-udn1 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::858:28ff:fe64:205/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever oc get pod -n z9 -o wide NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE IP NODE NOMINATED NODE READINESS GATES test-rc-gg5d2 1/1 Running 0 17h 10.128.2.31 worker-0.core.openshift-qe.sdn.com <none> <none> test-rc-ncfg7 1/1 Running 0 17h 10.129.2.20 worker-2 <none> <none> ####there is nodePort svc with ETP=local on default network namespace z0 # # oc get svc -n z0 hello-pod -o yaml apiVersion: v1 kind: Service metadata: creationTimestamp: "2025-03-06T02:49:04Z" labels: name: hello-pod name: hello-pod namespace: z0 resourceVersion: "676086" uid: 46b4191b-bec4-4aa8-97fc-fa6035e8382e spec: clusterIP: 172.30.225.251 clusterIPs: - 172.30.225.251 externalTrafficPolicy: Local internalTrafficPolicy: Cluster ipFamilies: - IPv4 ipFamilyPolicy: SingleStack ports: - name: http nodePort: 32705 port: 27017 protocol: TCP targetPort: 8080 selector: name: test-pods sessionAffinity: None type: NodePort status: loadBalancer: {} ******************** ############without BGP UDN adverstie, udn can access nodeport with different network on different node. but not different network on same node. see case 8 and 9 in https://docs.google.com/document/d/12ITKApvttTi2AO0bYGVwZGXFazLBNTcoLlmNmIXs9zI/edit?tab=t.0 # oc get pod -n z0 -o wide NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE IP NODE NOMINATED NODE READINESS GATES test-rc-772wm 1/1 Running 0 17h 10.129.2.24 worker-2 <none> <none> test-rc-dw7ww 1/1 Running 0 17h 10.128.2.32 worker-0.core.openshift-qe.sdn.com <none> <none> # oc rsh -n z9 test-rc-ncfg7 curl 192.168.111.25:32705 ^Ccommand terminated with exit code 130 # oc rsh -n z9 test-rc-ncfg7 curl 192.168.111.23:32705 Hello OpenShift! ######## After UDN advertised both two can be accessed on SGW ############# # oc rsh -n z9 test-rc-ncfg7 curl 192.168.111.23:32705 Hello OpenShift! # oc rsh -n z9 test-rc-ncfg7 curl 192.168.111.25:32705 Hello OpenShift!
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Please fill in the following template while reporting a bug and provide as much relevant information as possible. Doing so will give us the best chance to find a prompt resolution.
Affected Platforms:
Is it an
- internal CI failure
- customer issue / SD
- internal RedHat testing failure
If it is an internal RedHat testing failure:
- Please share a kubeconfig or creds to a live cluster for the assignee to debug/troubleshoot along with reproducer steps (specially if it's a telco use case like ICNI, secondary bridges or BM+kubevirt).
If it is a CI failure:
- Did it happen in different CI lanes? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
- Did it happen in both sdn and ovn jobs? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
- Did it happen in other platforms (e.g. aws, azure, gcp, baremetal etc) ? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
- When did the failure start happening? Please provide the UTC timestamp of the networking outage window from a sample failure run
- If it's a connectivity issue,
- What is the srcNode, srcIP and srcNamespace and srcPodName?
- What is the dstNode, dstIP and dstNamespace and dstPodName?
- What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)
If it is a customer / SD issue:
- Provide enough information in the bug description that Engineering doesn’t need to read the entire case history.
- Don’t presume that Engineering has access to Salesforce.
- Do presume that Engineering will access attachments through supportshell.
- Describe what each relevant attachment is intended to demonstrate (failed pods, log errors, OVS issues, etc).
- Referring to the attached must-gather, sosreport or other attachment, please provide the following details:
- If the issue is in a customer namespace then provide a namespace inspect.
- If it is a connectivity issue:
- What is the srcNode, srcNamespace, srcPodName and srcPodIP?
- What is the dstNode, dstNamespace, dstPodName and dstPodIP?
- What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)
- Please provide the UTC timestamp networking outage window from must-gather
- Please provide tcpdump pcaps taken during the outage filtered based on the above provided src/dst IPs
- If it is not a connectivity issue:
- Describe the steps taken so far to analyze the logs from networking components (cluster-network-operator, OVNK, SDN, openvswitch, ovs-configure etc) and the actual component where the issue was seen based on the attached must-gather. Please attach snippets of relevant logs around the window when problem has happened if any.
- When showing the results from commands, include the entire command in the output.
- For OCPBUGS in which the issue has been identified, label with “sbr-triaged”
- For OCPBUGS in which the issue has not been identified and needs Engineering help for root cause, label with “sbr-untriaged”
- Do not set the priority, that is owned by Engineering and will be set when the bug is evaluated
- Note: bugs that do not meet these minimum standards will be closed with label “SDN-Jira-template”
- For guidance on using this template please see
OCPBUGS Template Training for Networking components