Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Bugs'
  1. OpenShift Bugs
  2. OCPBUGS-49621

[UDN pre-merge testing] not able to create layer3 UDN from CRD on dualstack cluster

XMLWordPrintable

    • Important
    • No
    • SDN Sprint 266
    • 1
    • Rejected
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None

      Description of problem: [UDN pre-merge testing]  not able to create layer3 UDN from CRD on dualstack cluster

      Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

      How reproducible:

      Steps to Reproduce:

      1. On a dualstack cluster, created a UDN namespace with label

      2. Attempted to create a layer3 UDN from CRD

       

      $ cat /tmp/e2e-test-udn-networking-udn-bhmwv-n3wn8mngresource.json
      {
          "kind": "List",
          "apiVersion": "v1",
          "metadata": {},
          "items": [
              {
                  "apiVersion": "k8s.ovn.org/v1",
                  "kind": "UserDefinedNetwork",
                  "metadata":

      {                 "name": "udn-network-77827-ns1",                 "namespace": "e2e-test-udn-networking-udn-b6ldh"             }

      ,
                  "spec": {
                      "layer3": {
                          "mtu": 1400,
                          "role": "Primary",
                          "subnets": [
                             

      {                             "cidr": "10.150.0.0/16",                             "hostSubnet": 24                         }

      ,
                             

      {                             "cidr": "2010:100:200::0/48",                             "hostSubnet": 64                         }

                          ]
                      },
                      "topology": "Layer3"
                  }
              }
          ]
      }

      3.  got the following error message:

       The UserDefinedNetwork "udn-network-77827-ns1" is invalid: spec.layer3.subnets[1]: Invalid value: "object": HostSubnet must < 32 for ipv4 CIDR
          The UserDefinedNetwork "udn-network-77827-ns1" is invalid: spec.layer3.subnets[1]: Invalid value: "object": HostSubnet must < 32 for ipv4 CIDR

       

      subnets[1] is ipv6 hostsubnet, but it was compared with IPv4 CIDR

      Actual results:  Not able to create UDN in UDN namespace on dualstack cluster

      Expected results:  should be able to create UDN in UDN namespace on dualstack cluster

      Additional info:

      Please fill in the following template while reporting a bug and provide as much relevant information as possible. Doing so will give us the best chance to find a prompt resolution.

      Affected Platforms:

      Is it an

      1. internal CI failure
      2. customer issue / SD
      3. internal RedHat testing failure

      If it is an internal RedHat testing failure:

      • Please share a kubeconfig or creds to a live cluster for the assignee to debug/troubleshoot along with reproducer steps (specially if it's a telco use case like ICNI, secondary bridges or BM+kubevirt).

      If it is a CI failure:

      • Did it happen in different CI lanes? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • Did it happen in both sdn and ovn jobs? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • Did it happen in other platforms (e.g. aws, azure, gcp, baremetal etc) ? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • When did the failure start happening? Please provide the UTC timestamp of the networking outage window from a sample failure run
      • If it's a connectivity issue,
      • What is the srcNode, srcIP and srcNamespace and srcPodName?
      • What is the dstNode, dstIP and dstNamespace and dstPodName?
      • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)

      If it is a customer / SD issue:

      • Provide enough information in the bug description that Engineering doesn’t need to read the entire case history.
      • Don’t presume that Engineering has access to Salesforce.
      • Do presume that Engineering will access attachments through supportshell.
      • Describe what each relevant attachment is intended to demonstrate (failed pods, log errors, OVS issues, etc).
      • Referring to the attached must-gather, sosreport or other attachment, please provide the following details:
        • If the issue is in a customer namespace then provide a namespace inspect.
        • If it is a connectivity issue:
          • What is the srcNode, srcNamespace, srcPodName and srcPodIP?
          • What is the dstNode, dstNamespace, dstPodName and dstPodIP?
          • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)
          • Please provide the UTC timestamp networking outage window from must-gather
          • Please provide tcpdump pcaps taken during the outage filtered based on the above provided src/dst IPs
        • If it is not a connectivity issue:
          • Describe the steps taken so far to analyze the logs from networking components (cluster-network-operator, OVNK, SDN, openvswitch, ovs-configure etc) and the actual component where the issue was seen based on the attached must-gather. Please attach snippets of relevant logs around the window when problem has happened if any.
      • When showing the results from commands, include the entire command in the output.  
      • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has been identified, label with “sbr-triaged”
      • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has not been identified and needs Engineering help for root cause, label with “sbr-untriaged”
      • Do not set the priority, that is owned by Engineering and will be set when the bug is evaluated
      • Note: bugs that do not meet these minimum standards will be closed with label “SDN-Jira-template”
      • For guidance on using this template please see
        OCPBUGS Template Training for Networking  components

              rravaiol@redhat.com Riccardo Ravaioli
              jechen@redhat.com Jean Chen
              Jean Chen Jean Chen
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: