-
Bug
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Major
-
None
-
4.18.0
-
Important
-
No
-
Rejected
-
False
-
Description of problem: [BGP EIP on default network pre-merge testing] legacy egressIP (an IP address from same subnet of egress node) is not assigned to egress node
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
0. With basic BGP route advertisement on default network enabled and working
1. label a node to be egress node with egress-assignable=true label
2. create a namespace, label the namespace with a label that matches namespaceSelector of egressIP object that will be created in step 3
3. choose an unused IP from same subnet of egress node, use it in egressIP object, create egressIP object
- oc get egressip NAME EGRESSIPS ASSIGNED NODE ASSIGNED EGRESSIPS
egressip1 192.168.111.201
egressip2 8.8.8.8 worker-2 8.8.8.8
Actual results: egressIP from same subnet is not assigned to egress node
Expected results: egressIP from same subnet should be assigned to egress node
Additional info:
ovnkube-node log: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FvjzL6Vy17beMqdXP0ruXNxWQdUA1-Zw/view?usp=drive_link
must-gather: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1x0sXzQLw46_2W46O4J0bGDqTHfYEnt-x/view?usp=drive_link
When I was trying to clean up configuration after the test, I first deleted the namespace, then I found the legacy egressIP is assigned to egress node, but the second egressIP with random IP got unassigned. I added the namespace back and re-label it, then I saw both egressIP assigned.
[root@sdn-09 log_network_logs]# oc delete ns test
namespace "test" deleted
[root@sdn-09 log_network_logs]# oc get egressip
NAME EGRESSIPS ASSIGNED NODE ASSIGNED EGRESSIPS
egressip1 192.168.111.201 worker-2 192.168.111.201
egressip2 8.8.8.8
[root@sdn-09 log_network_logs]# oc new-project test
[root@sdn-09 log_network_logs]# oc get egressip
NAME EGRESSIPS ASSIGNED NODE ASSIGNED EGRESSIPS
egressip1 192.168.111.201 worker-2 192.168.111.201
egressip2 8.8.8.8 worker-2 8.8.8.8
Now, both egressIPs are advertised:
[root@sdn-09 demo]# sudo podman exec -it 5eda0c5903e6 /bin/sh
/ # vtysh
% Can't open configuration file /etc/frr/vtysh.conf due to 'No such file or directory'.
Configuration file[/etc/frr/frr.conf] processing failure: 11
Hello, this is FRRouting (version 9.1.2_git).
Copyright 1996-2005 Kunihiro Ishiguro, et al.
sdn-09.ocpnet.eng.rdu2.dc.redhat.com# show ip bgp
BGP table version is 12, local router ID is 192.168.122.1, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 64512
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, = multipath,
i internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Nexthop codes: @NNN nexthop's vrf id, < announce-nh-self
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*>i8.8.8.8/32 192.168.111.25 0 100 0 i
*>i10.128.0.0/23 192.168.111.20 0 100 0 i
*>i10.128.2.0/23 192.168.111.24 0 100 0 i
*>i10.129.0.0/23 192.168.111.21 0 100 0 i
*>i10.129.2.0/23 192.168.111.25 0 100 0 i
*>i10.130.0.0/23 192.168.111.22 0 100 0 i
*>i10.131.0.0/23 192.168.111.23 0 100 0 i
*> 192.168.1.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
*>i192.168.111.201/32
192.168.111.25 0 100 0 i
*> 192.169.1.1/32 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
Displayed 10 routes and 10 total paths
Please fill in the following template while reporting a bug and provide as much relevant information as possible. Doing so will give us the best chance to find a prompt resolution.
Affected Platforms:
Is it an
- internal CI failure
- customer issue / SD
- internal RedHat testing failure
If it is an internal RedHat testing failure:
- Please share a kubeconfig or creds to a live cluster for the assignee to debug/troubleshoot along with reproducer steps (specially if it's a telco use case like ICNI, secondary bridges or BM+kubevirt).
If it is a CI failure:
- Did it happen in different CI lanes? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
- Did it happen in both sdn and ovn jobs? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
- Did it happen in other platforms (e.g. aws, azure, gcp, baremetal etc) ? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
- When did the failure start happening? Please provide the UTC timestamp of the networking outage window from a sample failure run
- If it's a connectivity issue,
- What is the srcNode, srcIP and srcNamespace and srcPodName?
- What is the dstNode, dstIP and dstNamespace and dstPodName?
- What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)
If it is a customer / SD issue:
- Provide enough information in the bug description that Engineering doesn’t need to read the entire case history.
- Don’t presume that Engineering has access to Salesforce.
- Do presume that Engineering will access attachments through supportshell.
- Describe what each relevant attachment is intended to demonstrate (failed pods, log errors, OVS issues, etc).
- Referring to the attached must-gather, sosreport or other attachment, please provide the following details:
- If the issue is in a customer namespace then provide a namespace inspect.
- If it is a connectivity issue:
- What is the srcNode, srcNamespace, srcPodName and srcPodIP?
- What is the dstNode, dstNamespace, dstPodName and dstPodIP?
- What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)
- Please provide the UTC timestamp networking outage window from must-gather
- Please provide tcpdump pcaps taken during the outage filtered based on the above provided src/dst IPs
- If it is not a connectivity issue:
- Describe the steps taken so far to analyze the logs from networking components (cluster-network-operator, OVNK, SDN, openvswitch, ovs-configure etc) and the actual component where the issue was seen based on the attached must-gather. Please attach snippets of relevant logs around the window when problem has happened if any.
- When showing the results from commands, include the entire command in the output.
- For OCPBUGS in which the issue has been identified, label with “sbr-triaged”
- For OCPBUGS in which the issue has not been identified and needs Engineering help for root cause, label with “sbr-untriaged”
- Do not set the priority, that is owned by Engineering and will be set when the bug is evaluated
- Note: bugs that do not meet these minimum standards will be closed with label “SDN-Jira-template”
- For guidance on using this template please see
OCPBUGS Template Training for Networking components