Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Bugs'
  1. OpenShift Bugs
  2. OCPBUGS-45270

[IBM Cloud ROKS] ocp conformance test: "[sig-network] Services should respect internalTrafficPolicy=Local Pod and Node, to Pod (hostNetwork: true)" fails

XMLWordPrintable

    • Quality / Stability / Reliability
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • None
    • Moderate
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      Description of problem: Test expects worker name to be a "name" and not it's ip address. 

      Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):Failure was observed with 4.16.10. This failure likely occurs in all earlier and later releases.

      How reproducible: 100%

      Steps to Reproduce:

      1. Create an IBM ROKS cluster

      2. Run "[sig-network] Services [It] should respect internalTrafficPolicy=Local Pod and Node, to Pod (hostNetwork: true) [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s] [sig-network]" conformance test

      Actual results: Test fails

        • [FAILED] [7.510 seconds]
        [sig-network] Services [It] should respect internalTrafficPolicy=Local Pod and Node, to Pod (hostNetwork: true) [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s] [sig-network]
        k8s.io/kubernetes@v1.29.0/test/e2e/network/service.go:2618

          [FAILED] Expected
              <string>: test-crh3oun20pqn5glne7tg-roks416vpch-default-00000567
          to equal
              <string>: 10
          In [It] at: k8s.io/kubernetes@v1.29.0/test/e2e/network/util.go:182 @ 09/12/24 04:27:26.107
        ------------------------------

        Summarizing 1 Failure:
          [FAIL] [sig-network] Services [It] should respect internalTrafficPolicy=Local Pod and Node, to Pod (hostNetwork: true) [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s] [sig-network]
          k8s.io/kubernetes@v1.29.0/test/e2e/network/util.go:182

        Ran 1 of 1 Specs in 7.510 seconds
        FAIL! – 0 Passed | 1 Failed | 0 Pending | 0 Skipped
      fail [k8s.io/kubernetes@v1.29.0/test/e2e/network/util.go:182]: Expected
          <string>: test-crh3oun20pqn5glne7tg-roks416vpch-default-00000567
      to equal
          <string>: 10
      Ginkgo exit error 1: exit with code 1

      failed: (9.6s) 2024-09-12T04:27:26 "[sig-network] Services should respect internalTrafficPolicy=Local Pod and Node, to Pod (hostNetwork: true) [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]"

      Expected results:

      Test should succeed/pass.

      Additional info:

      Please fill in the following template while reporting a bug and provide as much relevant information as possible. Doing so will give us the best chance to find a prompt resolution.

      Affected Platforms:

      IBM Cloud ROKS

      Is it an

      1. internal CI failure
      2. customer issue / SD
      3. internal RedHat testing failure

      If it is an internal RedHat testing failure:

      • Please share a kubeconfig or creds to a live cluster for the assignee to debug/troubleshoot along with reproducer steps (specially if it's a telco use case like ICNI, secondary bridges or BM+kubevirt).

      If it is a CI failure:

      • Did it happen in different CI lanes? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • Did it happen in both sdn and ovn jobs? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • Did it happen in other platforms (e.g. aws, azure, gcp, baremetal etc) ? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • When did the failure start happening? Please provide the UTC timestamp of the networking outage window from a sample failure run
      • If it's a connectivity issue,
      • What is the srcNode, srcIP and srcNamespace and srcPodName?
      • What is the dstNode, dstIP and dstNamespace and dstPodName?
      • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)

      If it is a customer / SD issue:

      • Provide enough information in the bug description that Engineering doesn’t need to read the entire case history.
      • Don’t presume that Engineering has access to Salesforce.
      • Do presume that Engineering will access attachments through supportshell.
      • Describe what each relevant attachment is intended to demonstrate (failed pods, log errors, OVS issues, etc).
      • Referring to the attached must-gather, sosreport or other attachment, please provide the following details:
        • If the issue is in a customer namespace then provide a namespace inspect.
        • If it is a connectivity issue:
          • What is the srcNode, srcNamespace, srcPodName and srcPodIP?
          • What is the dstNode, dstNamespace, dstPodName and dstPodIP?
          • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)
          • Please provide the UTC timestamp networking outage window from must-gather
          • Please provide tcpdump pcaps taken during the outage filtered based on the above provided src/dst IPs
        • If it is not a connectivity issue:
          • Describe the steps taken so far to analyze the logs from networking components (cluster-network-operator, OVNK, SDN, openvswitch, ovs-configure etc) and the actual component where the issue was seen based on the attached must-gather. Please attach snippets of relevant logs around the window when problem has happened if any.
      • When showing the results from commands, include the entire command in the output.  
      • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has been identified, label with “sbr-triaged”
      • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has not been identified and needs Engineering help for root cause, label with “sbr-untriaged”
      • Do not set the priority, that is owned by Engineering and will be set when the bug is evaluated
      • Note: bugs that do not meet these minimum standards will be closed with label “SDN-Jira-template”
      • For guidance on using this template please see
        OCPBUGS Template Training for Networking  components

              bbennett@redhat.com Ben Bennett
              jeffbnowickirh Jeff Nowicki
              None
              None
              Anurag Saxena Anurag Saxena
              None
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: