Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Bugs'
  1. OpenShift Bugs
  2. OCPBUGS-42578

Network policy does not working properly during SDN live migration

XMLWordPrintable

    • None
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None

      Description of problem:

      Network policy doesn't work properly during SDN live migration. During the migration, when the 2 CNI plugins are running in parallel. Cross-CNI traffic will be denied by ACLs generated for the network policy.

      Version-release number of selected component (if applicable):

      How reproducible:

      Steps to reproduce:

      1. Deploy a cluster with openshift-sdn

      2. Create testpods in 2 different namespaces, z1 and z2.

      3. In namespace z1, create a network policy that allows traffic from z2.

      4. Trigger SDN live migration

      5. Monitor the accessibility between the pods in Z1 and Z2.

      Actual results:

      When the pods in z1 and z2 on different nodes are using different CNI, the traffic is denied.

      Expected results:

      The traffic shall be allowed regardless of the CNI utilized by either pod.

      Additional info:

      Please fill in the following template while reporting a bug and provide as much relevant information as possible. Doing so will give us the best chance to find a prompt resolution.

      Affected Platforms:

      Is it an

      1. internal CI failure
      2. customer issue / SD
      3. internal RedHat testing failure

      If it is an internal RedHat testing failure:

      • Please share a kubeconfig or creds to a live cluster for the assignee to debug/troubleshoot along with reproducer steps (especially if it's a telco use case like ICNI, secondary bridges or BM+kubevirt).

      If it is a CI failure:

      • Did it happen in different CI lanes? If so, please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • Did it happen in both sdn and ovn jobs? If so, please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • Did it happen in other platforms (e.g., AWS, Azure, GCP, baremetal, etc) ? If so, please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • When did the failure start happening? Please provide the UTC timestamp of the networking outage window from a sample failure run
      • If it's a connectivity issue,
      • What are the srcNode, srcIP, srcNamespace and srcPodName?
      • What are the dstNode, dstIP, dstNamespace and dstPodName?
      • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)

      If it is a customer / SD issue:

      • Provide enough information in the bug description that Engineering doesn’t need to read the entire case history.
      • Don’t presume that Engineering has access to Salesforce.
      • Do presume that Engineering will access attachments through supportshell.
      • Describe what each relevant attachment is intended to demonstrate (failed pods, log errors, OVS issues, etc).
      • Referring to the attached must-gather, SOSR report, or other attachment, please provide the following details:
        • If the issue is in a customer namespace, then provide a namespace inspection.
        • If it is a connectivity issue:
          • What are the srcNode, srcNamespace, srcPodName and srcPodIP?
          • What are the dstNode, dstNamespace, dstPodName and dstPodIP?
          • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)
          • Please provide the UTC timestamp networking outage window from must-gather
          • Please provide tcpdump pcaps taken during the outage filtered based on the above provided src/dst IPs
        • If it is not a connectivity issue:
          • Describe the steps taken so far to analyze the logs from networking components (cluster-network-operator, OVNK, SDN, openvswitch, ovs-configure, etc) and the actual component where the issue was seen based on the attached must-gather. Please attach snippets of relevant logs around the window when problem have happened, if any.
      • When showing the results from commands, include the entire command in the output.  
      • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has been identified, label with "sbr-triaged.”
      • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has not been identified and needs Engineering help for root cause, label with "sbr-untriaged.”
      • Do not set the priority; that is owned by Engineering and will be set when the bug is evaluated
      • Note: bugs that do not meet these minimum standards will be closed with label "SDN-Jira-template.”
      • For guidance on using this template, please see
        OCPBUGS Template Training for Networking  components

              pliurh Peng Liu
              pliurh Peng Liu
              Zhanqi Zhao Zhanqi Zhao
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: