Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Bugs'
  1. OpenShift Bugs
  2. OCPBUGS-39510

EgressIP doesn't work on azure hosted cluster

XMLWordPrintable

    • Important
    • No
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None

      Description of problem:
      EgressIP doesn't work on azure hosted cluster
      Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
      4.16.0-0.nightly-2024-09-03-161040

      How reproducible:
      Always

      Steps to Reproduce:
      egressIP continually failed on ci https://reportportal-openshift.apps.ocp-c1.prod.psi.redhat.com/ui/#prow/launches/all/606296/82292538?item1[…]252Cti_sok676b1k8j5%252Cti_r1ifkmkw19o1

      Then manually reproduced it on 4.16 version

      1.

      % oc get clusterversion
      NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
      version   4.16.0-0.nightly-2024-09-03-161040   True        False         51m     Cluster version is 4.16.0-0.nightly-2024-09-03-161040
      % oc get nodes
      NAME                                  STATUS   ROLES    AGE   VERSION
      44b5d8523d1079fbfd64-f412695a-2zd4g   Ready    worker   52m   v1.29.7+4510e9c
      44b5d8523d1079fbfd64-f412695a-p9tkk   Ready    worker   35m   v1.29.7+4510e9c
      44b5d8523d1079fbfd64-f412695a-qmg8g   Ready    worker   44m   v1.29.7+4510e9c
      % oc get egressIP -o yaml
      apiVersion: v1
      items:
      - apiVersion: k8s.ovn.org/v1
        kind: EgressIP
        metadata:
          creationTimestamp: "2024-09-04T07:54:13Z"
          generation: 2
          name: egressip-2
          resourceVersion: "25280"
          uid: 7536dc5b-3433-44c5-9a79-8d416eb9439e
        spec:
          egressIPs:
          - 10.0.0.100
          namespaceSelector:
            matchLabels:
              name: qe
        status:
          items:
          - egressIP: 10.0.0.100
            node: 44b5d8523d1079fbfd64-f412695a-2zd4g
      kind: List
      metadata:
        resourceVersion: ""
      
      
      % oc get cloudprivateipconfig -o yaml
      apiVersion: v1
      items:
      - apiVersion: cloud.network.openshift.io/v1
        kind: CloudPrivateIPConfig
        metadata:
          annotations:
            k8s.ovn.org/egressip-owner-ref: egressip-2
          creationTimestamp: "2024-09-04T07:54:13Z"
          finalizers:
          - cloudprivateipconfig.cloud.network.openshift.io/finalizer
          generation: 1
          name: 10.0.0.100
          resourceVersion: "25279"
          uid: f7a352ab-dfd7-4054-adef-8e67cff3f535
        spec:
          node: 44b5d8523d1079fbfd64-f412695a-2zd4g
        status:
          conditions:
          - lastTransitionTime: "2024-09-04T07:54:20Z"
            message: IP address successfully added
            observedGeneration: 1
            reason: CloudResponseSuccess
            status: "True"
            type: Assigned
          node: 44b5d8523d1079fbfd64-f412695a-2zd4g
      kind: List
      metadata:
        resourceVersion: ""
      % oc get pods -n test -o wide
      NAME        READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE     IP            NODE                                  NOMINATED NODE   READINESS GATES
      hello-pod   1/1     Running   0          9m50s   10.133.2.19   44b5d8523d1079fbfd64-f412695a-p9tkk   <none>           <none>
      
      Before apply label name=qe to test namespace
      % oc rsh -n test hello-pod
      ~ $ curl -I www.google.com
      HTTP/1.1 200 OK
      Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
      Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only: object-src 'none';base-uri 'self';script-src 'nonce-6GQ_dKaMJv56tSV4REwdqg' 'strict-dynamic' 'report-sample' 'unsafe-eval' 'unsafe-inline' https: http:;report-uri https://csp.withgoogle.com/csp/gws/other-hp
      P3P: CP="This is not a P3P policy! See g.co/p3phelp for more info."
      Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 07:55:19 GMT
      Server: gws
      X-XSS-Protection: 0
      X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN
      Transfer-Encoding: chunked
      Expires: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 07:55:19 GMT
      Cache-Control: private
      Set-Cookie: AEC=AVYB7cooomOER_1unbM8kK3bxAsihbPBJWvoY8o0h9PixKa8-rKZXL_79Mg; expires=Mon, 03-Mar-2025 07:55:19 GMT; path=/; domain=.google.com; Secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=lax
      Set-Cookie: NID=517=KqZXdcUCELVo9lig29gIMSdqJolZvyAaV4RRnd1TRhziowfgab-V3QsXLTwi5NkFebmlX4TKUiuwXABAKG4XrK9aQS4JzWBslWjsLsI4_e9Rim8e_IemlImWMnQcB_SLKJ92T7yQ1xmfLVy0qOuSbtCbHhUTy_O4X7v7JYOGA504iX8BELho; expires=Thu, 06-Mar-2025 07:55:19 GMT; path=/; domain=.google.com; HttpOnly
      
      
      

      After applying label name=qe to test namespace
      2.

      3.

      Actual results:
      % oc rsh -n test hello-pod
      ~ $
      ~ $ curl -I www.google.com --connect-timeout 5
      curl: (28) Failed to connect to www.google.com port 80 after 4929 ms: Operation timed out
      ~ $ curl -I www.google.com --connect-timeout 5
      curl: (28) Failed to connect to www.google.com port 80 after 4930 ms: Operation timed out
      ~ $ exit

      Expected results:
      Egress traffic should not break.

      Additional info:

      Please fill in the following template while reporting a bug and provide as much relevant information as possible. Doing so will give us the best chance to find a prompt resolution.

      Affected Platforms:

      Is it an

      1. internal CI failure
      2. customer issue / SD
      3. internal RedHat testing failure

      If it is an internal RedHat testing failure:

      • Please share a kubeconfig or creds to a live cluster for the assignee to debug/troubleshoot along with reproducer steps (specially if it's a telco use case like ICNI, secondary bridges or BM+kubevirt).

      If it is a CI failure:

      • Did it happen in different CI lanes? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • Did it happen in both sdn and ovn jobs? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • Did it happen in other platforms (e.g. aws, azure, gcp, baremetal etc) ? If so please provide links to multiple failures with the same error instance
      • When did the failure start happening? Please provide the UTC timestamp of the networking outage window from a sample failure run
      • If it's a connectivity issue,
      • What is the srcNode, srcIP and srcNamespace and srcPodName?
      • What is the dstNode, dstIP and dstNamespace and dstPodName?
      • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)

      If it is a customer / SD issue:

      • Provide enough information in the bug description that Engineering doesn’t need to read the entire case history.
      • Don’t presume that Engineering has access to Salesforce.
      • Do presume that Engineering will access attachments through supportshell.
      • Describe what each relevant attachment is intended to demonstrate (failed pods, log errors, OVS issues, etc).
      • Referring to the attached must-gather, sosreport or other attachment, please provide the following details:
        • If the issue is in a customer namespace then provide a namespace inspect.
        • If it is a connectivity issue:
          • What is the srcNode, srcNamespace, srcPodName and srcPodIP?
          • What is the dstNode, dstNamespace, dstPodName and dstPodIP?
          • What is the traffic path? (examples: pod2pod? pod2external?, pod2svc? pod2Node? etc)
          • Please provide the UTC timestamp networking outage window from must-gather
          • Please provide tcpdump pcaps taken during the outage filtered based on the above provided src/dst IPs
        • If it is not a connectivity issue:
          • Describe the steps taken so far to analyze the logs from networking components (cluster-network-operator, OVNK, SDN, openvswitch, ovs-configure etc) and the actual component where the issue was seen based on the attached must-gather. Please attach snippets of relevant logs around the window when problem has happened if any.
      • When showing the results from commands, include the entire command in the output.  
      • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has been identified, label with “sbr-triaged”
      • For OCPBUGS in which the issue has not been identified and needs Engineering help for root cause, label with “sbr-untriaged”
      • Do not set the priority, that is owned by Engineering and will be set when the bug is evaluated
      • Note: bugs that do not meet these minimum standards will be closed with label “SDN-Jira-template”
      • For guidance on using this template please see
        OCPBUGS Template Training for Networking  components

              mkennell@redhat.com Martin Kennelly
              huirwang Huiran Wang
              Huiran Wang Huiran Wang
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: