-
Bug
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Minor
-
None
-
4.16
-
Quality / Stability / Reliability
-
False
-
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description of problem:
In our docs under the section "Architectural diagram of an egress IP address configuration" we use an example network of 192.168.126.0/18 which is both incorrect and hard to understand. The correct network address with that CIDR mask would be 192.168.64.0/18 with a min of 192.168.64.0 and a max of 192.168.127.255 but also this network/cidr is difficult to understand since it is not octet-aligned. Can this diagram and example be updated to something like 192.168.126.0/24 which is easier to understand with a min of 192.168.126.0 and max of 192.168.126.255 and aligns with the last octet of the IP.