Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Bugs'
  1. OpenShift Bugs
  2. OCPBUGS-35436

Tracker: RHEL-44418 - Pods writing files larger than memory limit to PVCs tend to OOM frequently

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Bug Bug
    • Resolution: Done-Errata
    • Icon: Normal Normal
    • None
    • 4.16.0, 4.17.0
    • Node / Kubelet
    • None
    • Yes
    • Rejected
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • Hide
      * Previously, because of a critical regression on RHEL 9.4 kernels earlier than `5.14.0-427.26.1.el9_4`, the `mglru` feature had memory management disabled. In this release, the regression is fixed so that the `mglru` feature is now enabled in {product-title} {product-version}. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-35436[*OCPBUGS-35436])
      Show
      * Previously, because of a critical regression on RHEL 9.4 kernels earlier than `5.14.0-427.26.1.el9_4`, the `mglru` feature had memory management disabled. In this release, the regression is fixed so that the `mglru` feature is now enabled in {product-title} {product-version}. (link: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-35436 [* OCPBUGS-35436 ])
    • Bug Fix
    • Done

      Note, we're tracking the blocking fix for this via the workaround in OCPBUGS-35971, therefore moving this to blocker rejected. This will track picking up the fixed kernel and potentially disabling the workaround.

       

      Description of problem:

      Since 4.16.0 pods with memory limits tend to OOM very frequently when writing files larger than memory limit to PVC

      Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

      4.16.0-rc.4

      How reproducible:

      100% on certain types of storage
      (AWS FSx, certain LVMS setups, see additional info)

      Steps to Reproduce:

      1. Create pod/pvc that writes a file larger than the container memory limit (attached example)
      2.
      3.
      

      Actual results:

      OOMKilled

      Expected results:

      Success

      Additional info:

      Reproducer in OpenShift terms:
      https://gist.github.com/akalenyu/949200f48ec89c42429ddb177a2a4dee
      
      The following is relevant for eliminating the OpenShift layer from the issue.
      For simplicity, I will focus on BM setup that produces this with LVM storage.
      This is also reproducible on AWS clusters with NFS backed NetApp ONTAP FSx.
      
      Further reduced to exclude the OpenShift layer, LVM on a separate (non root) disk:
      
      Prepare disk
      lvcreate -T vg1/thin-pool-1 -V 10G -n oom-lv
      mkfs.ext4 /dev/vg1/oom-lv 
      mkdir /mnt/oom-lv
      mount /dev/vg1/oom-lv /mnt/oom-lv
      
      Run container
      podman run -m 600m --mount type=bind,source=/mnt/oom-lv,target=/disk --rm -it quay.io/centos/centos:stream9 bash
      [root@2ebe895371d2 /]# curl https://cloud.centos.org/centos/9-stream/x86_64/images/CentOS-Stream-GenericCloud-x86_64-9-20240527.0.x86_64.qcow2 -o /disk/temp
        % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                       Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
       47 1157M   47  550M    0     0   111M      0  0:00:10  0:00:04  0:00:06  111MKilled
      (Notice the process gets killed, I don't think podman ever whacks the whole container over this though)
      
      The same process on the same hardware on a 4.15 node (9.2) does not produce an OOM
      (vs 4.16 which is RHEL 9.4)
      
      For completeness, I will provide some details about the setup behind the LVM pool, though I believe it should not impact the decision about whether this is an issue:
      sh-5.1# pvdisplay 
        --- Physical volume ---
        PV Name               /dev/sdb
        VG Name               vg1
        PV Size               446.62 GiB / not usable 4.00 MiB
        Allocatable           yes 
        PE Size               4.00 MiB
        Total PE              114335
        Free PE               11434
        Allocated PE          102901
        PV UUID               <UUID>
      Hardware:
      SSD (INTEL SSDSC2KG480G8R) behind a RAID 0 of a PERC H330 Mini controller
      
      At the very least, this seems like a change in behavior but tbh I am leaning towards an outright bug.

              aos-node@redhat.com Node Team Bot Account
              akalenyu Alex Kalenyuk
              Sunil Choudhary Sunil Choudhary
              Denis Ollier Pinas, Jenia Peimer
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              25 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: