Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Bugs'
  1. OpenShift Bugs
  2. OCPBUGS-256

intra namespace allow network policy doesn't work after applying ingress&egress deny all network policy

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Moderate
    • SDN Sprint 225, SDN Sprint 226, SDN Sprint 227
    • 3
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None

    Description

      Description of problem:

        intra namespace allow network policy doesn't work after applying ingress&egress deny all network policy

      Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

        OpenShift 4.10.12

      How reproducible:

      Always

      Steps to Reproduce:
        1. Define deny all network policy for egress an ingress in a namespace:

      apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
      kind: NetworkPolicy
      metadata:
        name: default-deny-all
      spec:
        podSelector: {}
        policyTypes:
        - Ingress
        - Egress

      2. Define the following network policy to allow the traffic between the pods in the namespace:

      apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
      kind: NetworkPolicy
      metadata:
        name: allow-intra-namespace-001
      spec:
        egress:
        - to:
          - podSelector: {}
        ingress:
        - from:
          - podSelector: {}
        podSelector: {}
        policyTypes:
        - Ingress
        - Egress 

      3. Test the connectivity between two pods from the namespace.

      Actual results:

         The connectivity is not allowed

      Expected results:

        The connectivity should be allowed between pods from the same namespace.

      Additional info:

        After performing a test and analyzing SDN flows for the namespace: 

      sh-4.4# ovs-ofctl dump-flows -O OpenFlow13 br0 | grep --color 0x964376 
       cookie=0x0, duration=99375.342s, table=20, n_packets=14, n_bytes=588, priority=100,arp,in_port=21,arp_spa=10.128.2.20,arp_sha=00:00:0a:80:02:14/00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff actions=load:0x964376->NXM_NX_REG0[],goto_table:30
       cookie=0x0, duration=1681.845s, table=20, n_packets=11, n_bytes=462, priority=100,arp,in_port=24,arp_spa=10.128.2.23,arp_sha=00:00:0a:80:02:17/00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff actions=load:0x964376->NXM_NX_REG0[],goto_table:30
       cookie=0x0, duration=99375.342s, table=20, n_packets=135610, n_bytes=759239814, priority=100,ip,in_port=21,nw_src=10.128.2.20 actions=load:0x964376->NXM_NX_REG0[],goto_table:27
       cookie=0x0, duration=1681.845s, table=20, n_packets=2006, n_bytes=12684967, priority=100,ip,in_port=24,nw_src=10.128.2.23 actions=load:0x964376->NXM_NX_REG0[],goto_table:27
       cookie=0x0, duration=99375.342s, table=25, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=100,ip,nw_src=10.128.2.20 actions=load:0x964376->NXM_NX_REG0[],goto_table:27
       cookie=0x0, duration=1681.845s, table=25, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=100,ip,nw_src=10.128.2.23 actions=load:0x964376->NXM_NX_REG0[],goto_table:27
       cookie=0x0, duration=975.129s, table=27, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=150,reg0=0x964376,reg1=0x964376 actions=goto_table:30
       cookie=0x0, duration=99375.342s, table=70, n_packets=145260, n_bytes=11722173, priority=100,ip,nw_dst=10.128.2.20 actions=load:0x964376->NXM_NX_REG1[],load:0x15->NXM_NX_REG2[],goto_table:80
       cookie=0x0, duration=1681.845s, table=70, n_packets=2336, n_bytes=191079, priority=100,ip,nw_dst=10.128.2.23 actions=load:0x964376->NXM_NX_REG1[],load:0x18->NXM_NX_REG2[],goto_table:80
       cookie=0x0, duration=975.129s, table=80, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=150,reg0=0x964376,reg1=0x964376 actions=output:NXM_NX_REG2[]

      We see that the following rule doesn't match because `reg1` hasn't been defined:

       cookie=0x0, duration=975.129s, table=27, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=150,reg0=0x964376,reg1=0x964376 actions=goto_table:30 

       

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              jtanenba@redhat.com Jacob Tanenbaum
              rhn-support-malonso Maria Del Mar Alonso
              Anurag Saxena Anurag Saxena
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              9 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: