Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Bugs'
  1. OpenShift Bugs
  2. OCPBUGS-20485

Throughput regressed in uperf multi-thread pod to pod dataplane testing scenario compared to OCP 4.13

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • No
    • Rejected
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None

    Description

      Description of problem:

      When running dataplane test for pod to pod scenario through uperf workload (with 2 threads configuration), we observed throughput regressed in 4.14 when compared to OCP 4.13
      
      Throughput is (with uperf 2threads 1024 packet size configuration) - 4080 Mbps in 4.14 (OVN-IC) vs 4880 Mbps in 4.13 (OVN).
      
      We see same throughout between the environments when running uperf with 1 thread i.e 4930 Mbps in 4.14 (OVN-IC) vs 4940 in 4.13 (OVN).
      
      We can find more results here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CZKKljsozQ_LeLnq5Jk1bjowG4PVK35PiHHbjZeGG0k/edit?usp=sharing 

      Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

      OCP 4.14 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-10-06-234925
      OCP 4.13 4.13.0-0.nightly-2023-10-08-090900

      How reproducible:

      Always

      Steps to Reproduce:

      1. Deploy a 2 worker node OCP environment
      2. Run e2e po2pod dataplane test
      git clone https://github.com/cloud-bulldozer/e2e-benchmarking
      cd e2e-benchmarking/workloads/network-perf
      WORKLOAD=pod2svc ./run.sh 

      Actual results:

      16% decrease in throughput with uperf 2 threads

      Expected results:

      Throughput should be closer to 4.13 OVN environment.

      Additional info:

      Same configuration is used in both the environments i.e
      1. worker count - 24 (2 workers sufficient for this testing. This test makes sure that pods are scheduled on different worker nodes before it runs uperf tool)
      2. master and worker instance types - m5.2xlarge

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            sseethar Surya Seetharaman
            vkommadi@redhat.com VENKATA ANIL kumar KOMMADDI
            Anurag Saxena Anurag Saxena
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: