Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Bugs'
  1. OpenShift Bugs
  2. OCPBUGS-14986

[IBMCloud] Docs appear to mix up IBM Cloud VPC/x86_64 and IBM Cloud PowerVS

XMLWordPrintable

    • Quality / Stability / Reliability
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • 5
    • Low
    • No
    • None
    • None
    • OSDOCS Sprint 238
    • 1
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      Description of problem:

      OCP IPI Documentation appears to mix up references to IBM Cloud VPC (on x86_64) with IBM Cloud PowerVS. This can be confusing to users and misrepresents the status of both IBM Cloud providers.

      Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

      4.12 and 4.13

      How reproducible:

      N/A

      Steps to Reproduce:

      N/A
      

      Actual results:

      OCP 4.12 Docs show that IBM Cloud VPC (x86_64) GA'd on 4.12 (table 16)
      https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.12/release_notes/ocp-4-12-release-notes.html#ocp-4-12-technology-preview
      
      Yet OCP 4.13 Docs show that IBM Cloud VPC GA'd on 4.13 (table 18)
      https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.13/release_notes/ocp-4-13-release-notes.html#ocp-4-13-technology-preview

       

      Expected results:

      I believe IPI IBM Cloud PowerVS GA'd on 4.13 (not 100% certain on that, versus a 4.14+ GA), while IPI IBM Cloud VPC GA'd on 4.12, as 4.12 Docs mention.
      
      I also noticed that within the 4.12 Docs, IBM Cloud Power is mentioned as a new feature, although I would expect IBM Cloud VPC should've been instead
      https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.12/release_notes/ocp-4-12-release-notes.html#ocp-4-12-ibm-power
      
      This appears as expected in the 4.13 Docs, IBM Cloud Power, so that appears okay.
      https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.13/release_notes/ocp-4-13-release-notes.html#ocp-4-13-ibm-power

      Additional info:

       

              jaldinge@redhat.com Joe Aldinger
              cschaefe@redhat.com Christopher Schaefer
              None
              None
              Gaoyun Pei Gaoyun Pei
              None
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: