Uploaded image for project: 'OpenShift Network Plumbing'
  1. OpenShift Network Plumbing
  2. NP-1059

Whereabouts: Performance and scale considerations

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Epic Epic
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Undefined Undefined
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • Whereabouts: Performance and scale
    • BU Product Work
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False
    • Not Selected
    • To Do
    • OCPSTRAT-1357 - Whereabouts CNI enhancements
    • 75% To Do, 6% In Progress, 19% Done

      Epic Goal

      Address performance and scale issues in Whereabouts IPAM CNI

      Why is this important?

      Whereabouts is becoming increasingly more popular for use on workloads that operate at scale. Whereabouts was originally built as a convenience function for a handful of IPs, however, more and more customers want to use whereabouts in scale sitatuions.

      Notably, for telco and ai/ml scenarios. Some ai/ml scenarios launch a large number of pods that need to use secondary networks for related traffic.

       

      Supporting Documents

      Upstream collaboration outline

      Acceptance Criteria

      • Both original allocation mode, and fast_ranges mode work without user intervention (e.g. backwards compatible)
      • Reconciler still works with fast_ranges
      • fast_ranges: 50% reduction in allocation time over original allocation method

              bpickard@redhat.com Ben Pickard
              dosmith Douglas Smith
              Weibin Liang Weibin Liang
              Darragh Fitzmaurice Darragh Fitzmaurice
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              8 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: