Uploaded image for project: 'Network Observability'
  1. Network Observability
  2. NETOBSERV-2384

Unified Automated Testing Strategy for NetObserv

    • Icon: Epic Epic
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Normal Normal
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • netobserv-qe-tests-migration
    • To Do
    • Quality / Stability / Reliability
    • OCPSTRAT-2317Author new QE tests and move existing QE tests from private to upstream repos
    • 100% To Do, 0% In Progress, 0% Done
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False
    • Not Selected
    • None
    • None
    • None

      Epic Goal

      As part of Objective 4, KR-2 : Unified Quality Signal, we have an initiative for QE tests to reside in the component upstream repos instead of in openshift-tests private. 

      Why is this important?

      By addressing this Epic, we'd be able to address Objective 4, KR-2 of Unified quality signal and also adopt OTE (OpenShift Tests Extension) framework eventually.

      Planning Done Checklist

      The following items must be completed on the Epic prior to moving the Epic from Planning to the ToDo status

      • Priority+ is set by engineering
      • Epic must be Linked to a +Parent Feature
      • Target version+ must be set
      • Assignee+ must be set
      • (Enhancement Proposal is Implementable
      • (No outstanding questions about major work breakdown
      • (Are all Stakeholders known? Have they all been notified about this item?
      • Does this epic affect SD? {}Have they been notified{+}? (View plan definition for current suggested assignee)
        1. Please use the “Discussion Needed: Service Delivery Architecture Overview” checkbox to facilitate the conversation with SD Architects. The SD architecture team monitors this checkbox which should then spur the conversation between SD and epic stakeholders. Once the conversation has occurred, uncheck the “Discussion Needed: Service Delivery Architecture Overview” checkbox and record the outcome of the discussion in the epic description here.
        2. The guidance here is that unless it is very clear that your epic doesn’t have any managed services impact, default to use the Discussion Needed checkbox to facilitate that conversation.

      Additional information on each of the above items can be found here: Networking Definition of Planned

      Acceptance Criteria

      • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

      Dependencies (internal and external)

      • Several of our e2e tests depend on LokiStack and all our loki libs of provisioning lokistack and storage required comes from logging team. To move our e2e tests with Loki will need libraries that provision LokiStack's prerequisites across various cloud provides to be available as a golang package.
      • OTE is not ready for 3rd level Operators.

      Previous Work (Optional):

      NA

      Open questions::

      NA

      Done Checklist

      • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
      • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
      • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
      • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
      • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
      • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

              rhn-support-memodi Mehul Modi
              rhn-support-memodi Mehul Modi
              None
              None
              None
              None
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: