Uploaded image for project: 'Network Observability'
  1. Network Observability
  2. NETOBSERV-1335

Capture and expose DSCP field from IP header

    • capture-dscp-header
    • BU Product Work
    • False
    • None
    • False
    • Not Selected
    • To Do
    • OCPSTRAT-963 - Capture and expose DSCP field from IP header
    • OCPSTRAT-963Capture and expose DSCP field from IP header
    • 0% To Do, 0% In Progress, 100% Done
    • M

      Epic Goal

      There have been work from other teams to use DSCP and QoS, exposing this field is interesting.

      Work that needs to be done:

      • capture this field from IP header (ebpf-agent). The ip header is already parsed
      • add new field to FLP protobuf
      • expose this field & filter in the console plugin

      Why is this important?

      Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) is a means of classifying and managing network traffic and of providing quality of service (QoS) in modern Layer 3 IP networks. It uses the 6-bit Differentiated Services (DS) field in the IP header for the purpose of packet classification.

      Planning Done Checklist

      The following items must be completed on the Epic prior to moving the Epic from Planning to the ToDo status

      • Priority+ is set by engineering
      • Epic must be Linked to a +Parent Feature
      • Target version+ must be set
      • Assignee+ must be set
      • (Enhancement Proposal is Implementable
      • (No outstanding questions about major work breakdown
      • (Are all Stakeholders known? Have they all been notified about this item?
      • Does this epic affect SD? {}Have they been notified{+}? (View plan definition for current suggested assignee)
        1. Please use the "Discussion Needed: Service Delivery Architecture Overview" checkbox to facilitate the conversation with SD Architects. The SD architecture team monitors this checkbox which should then spur the conversation between SD and epic stakeholders. Once the conversation has occurred, uncheck the "Discussion Needed: Service Delivery Architecture Overview" checkbox and record the outcome of the discussion in the epic description here.
        2. The guidance here is that unless it is very clear that your epic doesn't have any managed services impact, default to use the Discussion Needed checkbox to facilitate that conversation.

      Additional information on each of the above items can be found here: Networking Definition of Planned

      Acceptance Criteria

      • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
      • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement
        details and documents.

      ...

      Dependencies (internal and external)

      1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NETOBSERV-1151 

      Previous Work (Optional):

      1. ...

      Open questions::

      1. ...

      Done Checklist

      • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
      • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
      • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
      • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
      • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
      • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

            mmahmoud@redhat.com Mohamed Mahmoud
            jpinsonn@redhat.com Julien Pinsonneau
            Amogh Rameshappa Devapura Amogh Rameshappa Devapura
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: