Uploaded image for project: 'Network Edge'
  1. Network Edge
  2. NE-2375

Remove x-k8s.io group from Gateway API CRD VAP

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Epic Epic
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: Undefined Undefined
    • None
    • None
    • Remove x-k8s.io group from Gateway API CRD VAP
    • To Do
    • Product / Portfolio Work
    • OCPSTRAT-2746Gateway API using Istio for Cluster Ingress - Post 4.21 tasks
    • 100% To Do, 0% In Progress, 0% Done
    • False
    • Hide

      None

      Show
      None
    • False
    • Not Selected
    • None

      Template:

      Networking Definition of Planned

      Epic Template descriptions and documentation

      Epic Goal

      Remove the group x-k8s.io from Gateway API CRD validation.

      Why is this important?

      We have requests from partners and customers to be able to deploy experimental CRDs in Openshift to test new features.

      These APIs belong to an experimental group and have an experimental name (eg.: XListenerSet on gateway.networking.x-k8s.io) and don't represent a risk for our Gateway API implementation, as it disables the reconciliation of any API on experimental group.

      This way we can remove this restriction

      Planning Done Checklist

      The following items must be completed on the Epic prior to moving the Epic from Planning to the ToDo status

      • Priority+ is set by engineering
      • Epic must be Linked to a +Parent Feature
      • Target version+ must be set
      • Assignee+ must be set
      • (Enhancement Proposal is Implementable
      • (No outstanding questions about major work breakdown
      • (Are all Stakeholders known? Have they all been notified about this item?
      • Does this epic affect SD? {}Have they been notified{+}? (View plan definition for current suggested assignee)
        1. Please use the “Discussion Needed: Service Delivery Architecture Overview” checkbox to facilitate the conversation with SD Architects. The SD architecture team monitors this checkbox which should then spur the conversation between SD and epic stakeholders. Once the conversation has occurred, uncheck the “Discussion Needed: Service Delivery Architecture Overview” checkbox and record the outcome of the discussion in the epic description here.
        2. The guidance here is that unless it is very clear that your epic doesn’t have any managed services impact, default to use the Discussion Needed checkbox to facilitate that conversation.

      Additional information on each of the above items can be found here: Networking Definition of Planned

      Acceptance Criteria

      • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
      • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement
        details and documents.

      ...

      Dependencies (internal and external)

      1.

      ...

      Previous Work (Optional):

      1. …

      Open questions::

      1. …

      Done Checklist

      • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
      • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
      • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
      • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
      • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
      • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
      • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

              rh-ee-rpchevuz Ricardo Pchevuzinske Katz
              rh-ee-rpchevuz Ricardo Pchevuzinske Katz
              None
              None
              None
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated: